ENEL AMERICAS S.A.
CIK 912505Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Winston & StrawnFirst linked Jul 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 585 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Norton RoseFirst linked Jul 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 305 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 0.52× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Chadbourne & ParkeFirst linked Feb 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 110 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.64× · Went dark 0.62× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Feb 2004 · Named in a filing · 1,696 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Maples and CalderFirst linked Feb 2004 · Text search only · 1,145 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloyFirst linked Feb 2004 · Text search only · 439 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 0.70×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Winston & Strawn | Jul 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 585 | 1.18 | 0.60 | 1.01 |
| Norton Rose | Jul 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 305 | 1.11 | 0.52 | 1.22 |
| Chadbourne & Parke | Feb 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 110 | 1.64 | 0.62 | 0.82 |
| Davis Polk | Feb 2004 | Named in a filing | 1,696 | 1.25 | 0.06 | 0.99 |
| Maples and Calder | Feb 2004 | Text search only | 1,145 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0.90 |
| Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy | Feb 2004 | Text search only | 439 | 1.01 | 0.35 | 0.70 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Allen MillerWinston & StrawnFirst linked May 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.37× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- J. Allen MillerChadbourne & ParkeFirst linked Nov 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.43× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Nicholas A. KronfeldDavis PolkFirst linked Feb 2004 · Named in a filing · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.33×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Allen MillerWinston & Strawn | May 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 2.37 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| J. Allen MillerChadbourne & Parke | Nov 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 2.43 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Nicholas A. KronfeldDavis Polk | Feb 2004 | Named in a filing | 27 | 1.19 | 0.00 | 0.33 |