CRYSTALLEX INTERNATIONAL CORP CRYFQ (last ticker on record)
CIK 912500Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Nov 2008
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Apr 2006 to Dec 2011
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Jul 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- McCarthy TetraultFirst linked Oct 2002 · Named in a filing · 111 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.76× · Went dark 0.57× · 95% wipeout 1.41×
- Goodmans LLPFirst linked Sep 2003 · Text search only · 72 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.32× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Schulte Roth & ZabelFirst linked Sep 2003 · Text search only · 296 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Aird & BerlisFirst linked Aug 2003 · Text search only · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.75× · Went dark 0.74× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
- McMillan LLPFirst linked Aug 2003 · Text search only · 95 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 1.73× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Jul 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.85 |
| McCarthy Tetrault | Oct 2002 | Named in a filing | 111 | 0.76 | 0.57 | 1.41 |
| Goodmans LLP | Sep 2003 | Text search only | 72 | 1.03 | 0.32 | 1.01 |
| Schulte Roth & Zabel | Sep 2003 | Text search only | 296 | 0.93 | 0.44 | 0.99 |
| Aird & Berlis | Aug 2003 | Text search only | 25 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.89 |
| McMillan LLP | Aug 2003 | Text search only | 95 | 1.06 | 1.73 | 0.92 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Riccardo LeofantiSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Sep 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Christopher W. MorganSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Jul 2005 · Named in a filing · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.52×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Riccardo LeofantiSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Sep 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 25 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.16 |
| Christopher W. MorganSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Jul 2005 | Named in a filing | 26 | 1.34 | 0.00 | 1.52 |