PROGRESSIVE GAMING INTERNATIONAL CORP PGIC (last ticker on record)
CIK 912241Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- 95% wipeout
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Bankruptcy
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 4
- Newest began Mar 2009
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Jun 2005 to Jun 2010
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Preston Gates & EllisFirst linked Apr 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 159 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.36× · Went dark 1.62× · 95% wipeout 1.44×
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Nov 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Mayer BrownFirst linked Nov 2003 · Named in a filing · 680 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Greenberg TraurigFirst linked Sep 2001 · Named in a filing · 1,223 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp LLPFirst linked Aug 2000 · Named in a filing · 67 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.28× · Went dark 1.77× · 95% wipeout 1.64×
- Fenwick & West LLPFirst linked Oct 2001 · Text search only · 443 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.21× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- Lionel Sawyer & CollinsFirst linked Sep 2001 · Text search only · 128 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.88× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Preston Gates & Ellis | Apr 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 159 | 1.36 | 1.62 | 1.44 |
| Cooley LLP | Nov 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| Mayer Brown | Nov 2003 | Named in a filing | 680 | 0.98 | 0.34 | 0.94 |
| Greenberg Traurig | Sep 2001 | Named in a filing | 1,223 | 1.01 | 1.03 | 1.10 |
| Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp LLP | Aug 2000 | Named in a filing | 67 | 2.28 | 1.77 | 1.64 |
| Fenwick & West LLP | Oct 2001 | Text search only | 443 | 0.95 | 0.21 | 1.23 |
| Lionel Sawyer & Collins | Sep 2001 | Text search only | 128 | 1.07 | 0.88 | 0.96 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Daniel K. DonahueGreenberg TraurigFirst linked May 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 31 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.38× · 95% wipeout 1.68×
- Charles S. KimCooley LLPFirst linked Apr 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 118 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.41× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.37×
- Steven M. PrzesmickiCooley LLPFirst linked Nov 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.94×
- Daniel P. MeehanCooley LLPFirst linked Jun 2005 · Text search only · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.32× · Went dark 1.62× · 95% wipeout 0.70×
- Nick P. SaggeseSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Nov 2003 · Text search only · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- NICHOLAS P. SAGGESEHolme Roberts & Owen LLPFirst linked Sep 2001 · Text search only · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.97× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.40×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel K. DonahueGreenberg Traurig | May 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 31 | 1.10 | 0.38 | 1.68 |
| Charles S. KimCooley LLP | Apr 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 118 | 0.41 | 0.00 | 1.37 |
| Steven M. PrzesmickiCooley LLP | Nov 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 20 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.94 |
| Daniel P. MeehanCooley LLP | Jun 2005 | Text search only | 11 | 1.32 | 1.62 | 0.70 |
| Nick P. SaggeseSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Nov 2003 | Text search only | 11 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.94 |
| NICHOLAS P. SAGGESEHolme Roberts & Owen LLP | Sep 2001 | Text search only | 26 | 1.97 | 0.00 | 1.40 |