CUBIST PHARMACEUTICALS INC CBST (last ticker on record)
CIK 912183Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Jun 2006
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Hughes Hubbard & ReedFirst linked Dec 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 121 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.21× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Ropes & GrayFirst linked Aug 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 914 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Bingham McCutchenFirst linked Sep 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 291 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.38× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Bingham DanaFirst linked Jun 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 104 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.37× · Went dark 0.54× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Aug 2013 · Text search only · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hughes Hubbard & Reed | Dec 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 121 | 1.17 | 0.21 | 1.26 |
| Ropes & Gray | Aug 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 914 | 0.98 | 0.14 | 0.92 |
| Bingham McCutchen | Sep 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 291 | 0.94 | 0.38 | 1.06 |
| Bingham Dana | Jun 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 104 | 1.37 | 0.54 | 1.14 |
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Aug 2013 | Text search only | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.69 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- David C. SchwartzDLA PiperFirst linked Dec 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.60×
- Christopher D. ComeauRopes & GrayFirst linked Aug 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.66× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.49×
- Paul KinsellaRopes & GrayFirst linked Aug 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 54 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.70× · Went dark 0.39× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
- Laurie A. CervenyMorgan LewisFirst linked Apr 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.32× · Went dark 1.30× · 95% wipeout 0.53×
- Julio E. VegaBingham McCutchenFirst linked Jun 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.78× · Went dark 2.41× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- JUSTIN P. MORREALEBingham DanaFirst linked Jun 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Francis J. AquilaSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Aug 2013 · Text search only · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.52× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.35×
- George J. SampasSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Aug 2013 · Text search only · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.32× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David C. SchwartzDLA Piper | Dec 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 21 | 1.21 | 0.00 | 0.60 |
| Christopher D. ComeauRopes & Gray | Aug 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 21 | 0.66 | 0.00 | 0.49 |
| Paul KinsellaRopes & Gray | Aug 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 54 | 1.70 | 0.39 | 0.66 |
| Laurie A. CervenyMorgan Lewis | Apr 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 22 | 1.32 | 1.30 | 0.53 |
| Julio E. VegaBingham McCutchen | Jun 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 22 | 0.78 | 2.41 | 0.76 |
| JUSTIN P. MORREALEBingham Dana | Jun 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.98 |
| Francis J. AquilaSullivan & Cromwell | Aug 2013 | Text search only | 21 | 1.52 | 0.00 | 0.35 |
| George J. SampasSullivan & Cromwell | Aug 2013 | Text search only | 14 | 1.32 | 0.00 | 0.00 |