SOLA INTERNATIONAL INC SOL (last ticker on record)
CIK 912088Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Arnold & PorterFirst linked Jul 2001 · Named in a filing · 254 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Gardner Carton & DouglasFirst linked Jul 2001 · Named in a filing · 46 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.68× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- Fried FrankFirst linked Jun 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 540 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.33× · Went dark 0.24× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Cahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Jul 2001 · Text search only · 598 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arnold & Porter | Jul 2001 | Named in a filing | 254 | 1.03 | 0.11 | 0.84 |
| Gardner Carton & Douglas | Jul 2001 | Named in a filing | 46 | 1.68 | 0.00 | 0.90 |
| Fried Frank | Jun 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 540 | 1.33 | 0.24 | 0.94 |
| Cahill Gordon & Reindel | Jul 2001 | Text search only | 598 | 1.03 | 0.18 | 0.77 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- George C. McKannGardner Carton & DouglasFirst linked Jul 2001 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.83× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.32×
- TIMOTHY E. PETERSONFried FrankFirst linked May 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| George C. McKannGardner Carton & Douglas | Jul 2001 | Named in a filing | 9 | 1.83 | 0.00 | 2.32 |
| TIMOTHY E. PETERSONFried Frank | May 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 13 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.88 |