AVONDALE INC
CIK 911634Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Apr 2006
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a grand jury subpoenaForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Bradley Arant Rose & WhiteFirst linked Aug 2003 · Named in a filing · 32 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.54× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.29×
- King & SpaldingFirst linked Sep 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 426 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Aug 2003 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bradley Arant Rose & White | Aug 2003 | Named in a filing | 32 | 1.54 | 0.00 | 0.29 |
| King & Spalding | Sep 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 426 | 1.28 | 0.35 | 1.04 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Aug 2003 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Alan J. PrinceKing & SpaldingFirst linked Aug 2003 · Named in a filing · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.45× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.68×
- MARY A. BERNARDKing & SpaldingFirst linked Sep 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.11× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.08×
- Keith M. TownsendKing & SpaldingFirst linked Apr 2005 · Text search only · 58 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.76× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.30×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alan J. PrinceKing & Spalding | Aug 2003 | Named in a filing | 16 | 0.45 | 0.00 | 0.68 |
| MARY A. BERNARDKing & Spalding | Sep 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 14 | 2.11 | 0.00 | 2.08 |
| Keith M. TownsendKing & Spalding | Apr 2005 | Text search only | 58 | 0.76 | 0.00 | 0.30 |