PARTNERRE LTD PRE (last ticker on record)
CIK 911421Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Nov 2006
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions an SEC subpoenaForm 10-K/A (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked May 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 826 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.83×
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Aug 2009 · Named in a filing · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Nov 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.First linked Nov 2002 · Named in a filing · 995 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Appleby (Cayman) Ltd.First linked Oct 2001 · Named in a filing · 77 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.62× · Went dark 1.12× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Willkie FarrFirst linked Oct 2001 · Named in a filing · 539 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.40× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Sutherland Asbill & BrennanFirst linked Jun 2015 · Text search only · 130 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.16× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Conyers Dill & PearmanFirst linked Mar 2015 · Text search only · 531 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | May 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 826 | 1.02 | 0.18 | 0.83 |
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Aug 2009 | Named in a filing | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.69 |
| Davis Polk | Nov 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. | Nov 2002 | Named in a filing | 995 | 1.46 | 0.37 | 0.80 |
| Appleby (Cayman) Ltd. | Oct 2001 | Named in a filing | 77 | 1.62 | 1.12 | 1.18 |
| Willkie Farr | Oct 2001 | Named in a filing | 539 | 1.23 | 0.40 | 0.84 |
| Sutherland Asbill & Brennan | Jun 2015 | Text search only | 130 | 0.94 | 0.16 | 0.77 |
| Conyers Dill & Pearman | Mar 2015 | Text search only | 531 | 0.89 | 0.35 | 1.16 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Scott D. MillerSullivan & CromwellFirst linked May 2019 · Named in SEC correspondence · 47 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.40× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.30×
- Raphael M. RussoPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Apr 2016 · Named in a filing · 72 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.67× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Kelley D. ParkerPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked May 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Toby S. MyersonPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked May 2015 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.52× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Phillip R. MillsDavis PolkFirst linked Oct 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.54×
- Ethan T. JamesDebevoise & PlimptonFirst linked Jul 2003 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.90× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Richard J. SandlerDavis PolkFirst linked Nov 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.94× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Patrick J. NaughtonSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Mar 2015 · Text search only · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.63× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.39×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scott D. MillerSullivan & Cromwell | May 2019 | Named in SEC correspondence | 47 | 2.40 | 0.00 | 1.30 |
| Raphael M. RussoPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Apr 2016 | Named in a filing | 72 | 1.67 | 0.00 | 1.02 |
| Kelley D. ParkerPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | May 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Toby S. MyersonPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | May 2015 | Named in a filing | 10 | 0.52 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Phillip R. MillsDavis Polk | Oct 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 14 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.54 |
| Ethan T. JamesDebevoise & Plimpton | Jul 2003 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 1.90 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Richard J. SandlerDavis Polk | Nov 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 1.94 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Patrick J. NaughtonSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Mar 2015 | Text search only | 18 | 0.63 | 0.00 | 0.39 |