LODGENET INTERACTIVE CORP LNET (last ticker on record)
CIK 911002Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Bankruptcy
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Jan 2013
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Pillsbury WinthropFirst linked May 2002 · Named in a filing · 516 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- LEONARD, STREET AND DEINARDFirst linked Mar 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.05× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 0.64×
- Pillsbury Madison & Sutro LLPFirst linked May 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 117 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 1.45× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pillsbury Winthrop | May 2002 | Named in a filing | 516 | 1.13 | 0.82 | 1.24 |
| LEONARD, STREET AND DEINARD | Mar 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 37 | 1.05 | 0.60 | 0.64 |
| Pillsbury Madison & Sutro LLP | May 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 117 | 0.92 | 1.45 | 1.12 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Stephen M. QuinlivanLEONARD, STREET AND DEINARDFirst linked Apr 2004 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.64× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.66×
- Mark S. WeitzLEONARD, STREET AND DEINARDFirst linked Mar 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 1.12× · 95% wipeout 0.47×
- GREGG F. VIGNOSPillsbury Madison & Sutro LLPFirst linked May 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.19×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stephen M. QuinlivanLEONARD, STREET AND DEINARD | Apr 2004 | Named in a filing | 11 | 1.64 | 0.00 | 1.66 |
| Mark S. WeitzLEONARD, STREET AND DEINARD | Mar 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 18 | 0.88 | 1.12 | 0.47 |
| GREGG F. VIGNOSPillsbury Madison & Sutro LLP | May 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 1.27 | 0.00 | 1.19 |