COCA COLA FEMSA SAB DE CV KOF (last ticker on record)
CIK 910631Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Cleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Jan 2003 · Named in SEC correspondence · 742 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.12× · 95% wipeout 0.72×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Jul 2010 · Text search only · 2,650 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Cravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Jan 2003 · Text search only · 839 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.03× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Jan 2003 · Text search only · 1,696 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Jan 2003 | Named in SEC correspondence | 742 | 1.30 | 0.12 | 0.72 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Jul 2010 | Text search only | 2,650 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.84 |
| Cravath Swaine & Moore | Jan 2003 | Text search only | 839 | 1.29 | 0.03 | 0.82 |
| Davis Polk | Jan 2003 | Text search only | 1,696 | 1.25 | 0.06 | 0.99 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Manuel SilvaCleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Sep 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Duane McLaughlinCleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Sep 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.35×
- Jaime A. El KouryCleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Jan 2003 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Ethan A. KlingsbergCleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Jan 2003 · Text search only · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.14× · Went dark 0.84× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- Richard HallCravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Jan 2003 · Text search only · 47 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.81× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.52×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manuel SilvaCleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Sep 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.08 |
| Duane McLaughlinCleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Sep 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 30 | 0.93 | 0.00 | 0.35 |
| Jaime A. El KouryCleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Jan 2003 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Ethan A. KlingsbergCleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Jan 2003 | Text search only | 30 | 2.14 | 0.84 | 1.27 |
| Richard HallCravath Swaine & Moore | Jan 2003 | Text search only | 47 | 0.81 | 0.00 | 0.52 |