CBL & ASSOCIATES PROPERTIES INC CBL (last ticker on record)
CIK 910612Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- 95% wipeout
- Restructuring
- Bankruptcy
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Nov 2020
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Feb 2007 to Oct 2020
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 1
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Husch BlackwellFirst linked Dec 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 154 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Husch & EppenbergerFirst linked Dec 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.93×
- Morrison & FoersterFirst linked Jan 2006 · Named in a filing · 825 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- Shumacker Witt Gaither & Whitaker, P.C.First linked Aug 2002 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.81×
- Willkie FarrFirst linked May 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 539 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.40× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Witt Gaither & WhitakerFirst linked Aug 2002 · Text search only · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 2.20× · 95% wipeout 2.46×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Husch Blackwell | Dec 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 154 | 1.00 | 1.03 | 1.18 |
| Husch & Eppenberger | Dec 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 26 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.93 |
| Morrison & Foerster | Jan 2006 | Named in a filing | 825 | 1.17 | 0.55 | 1.15 |
| Shumacker Witt Gaither & Whitaker, P.C. | Aug 2002 | Named in a filing | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.81 |
| Willkie Farr | May 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 539 | 1.23 | 0.40 | 0.84 |
| Witt Gaither & Whitaker | Aug 2002 | Text search only | 8 | 0.00 | 2.20 | 2.46 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Steven R. BarrettHusch Blackwell | Dec 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 10 | 0.00 | 2.58 | 2.47 |