HAIN CELESTIAL GROUP INC HAIN (last ticker on record)
CIK 910406Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Apr 2025
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Aug 2015 to Jul 2026
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative proceedingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC enforcement releaseSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- SEC enforcement releaseSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Nov 2022 · Named in a filing · 1,396 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Cravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Nov 2021 · Named in a filing · 839 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.03× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Feb 2019 · Named in a filing · 1,051 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- DLA PiperFirst linked Nov 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Sep 2005 · Named in a filing · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Jun 1998 · Named in a filing · 783 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Cahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Jul 1997 · Named in a filing · 598 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Nov 2022 | Named in a filing | 1,396 | 1.28 | 0.11 | 0.92 |
| Cravath Swaine & Moore | Nov 2021 | Named in a filing | 839 | 1.29 | 0.03 | 0.85 |
| Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Feb 2019 | Named in a filing | 1,051 | 1.31 | 0.27 | 0.91 |
| DLA Piper | Nov 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| Cooley LLP | Sep 2005 | Named in a filing | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Jun 1998 | Named in a filing | 783 | 1.09 | 0.11 | 1.03 |
| Cahill Gordon & Reindel | Jul 1997 | Named in a filing | 598 | 1.03 | 0.18 | 0.77 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- D. Scott BennettCravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Nov 2021 · Named in a filing · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.89× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.34×
- Christopher P. GiordanoDLA PiperFirst linked Oct 2012 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.51×
- Sidney BurkeDLA PiperFirst linked Mar 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.93× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Geoffrey E. LiebmannCahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Sep 2005 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.16× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.47×
- Sanjay M. ShirodkarDLA PiperFirst linked May 2009 · Text search only · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D. Scott BennettCravath Swaine & Moore | Nov 2021 | Named in a filing | 22 | 1.89 | 0.00 | 2.34 |
| Christopher P. GiordanoDLA Piper | Oct 2012 | Named in a filing | 11 | 0.92 | 0.00 | 0.51 |
| Sidney BurkeDLA Piper | Mar 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 14 | 1.93 | 0.00 | 1.03 |
| Geoffrey E. LiebmannCahill Gordon & Reindel | Sep 2005 | Named in a filing | 10 | 1.16 | 0.00 | 1.47 |
| Sanjay M. ShirodkarDLA Piper | May 2009 | Text search only | 17 | 0.71 | 0.00 | 0.92 |