LXP Industrial Trust LXP (last ticker on record)
CIK 910108Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 10
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Nov 2026 · Named in a filing · 1,125 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.20× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Hogan Lovells US LLPFirst linked Nov 2023 · Named in a filing · 487 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Venable LLPFirst linked Jan 2006 · Named in a filing · 506 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.38× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
- Piper RudnickFirst linked Jun 2002 · Named in a filing · 183 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- Piper & Marbury L.L.P.First linked Nov 1997 · Named in a filing · 143 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.05× · Went dark 1.33× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
- Paul HastingsFirst linked May 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 768 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Dec 2013 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Morgan LewisFirst linked Nov 2008 · Text search only · 1,028 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Edwards & AngellFirst linked Oct 2001 · Text search only · 81 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.68× · Went dark 0.59× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Nov 2026 | Named in a filing | 1,125 | 1.23 | 0.20 | 0.96 |
| Hogan Lovells US LLP | Nov 2023 | Named in a filing | 487 | 0.96 | 0.26 | 0.85 |
| Venable LLP | Jan 2006 | Named in a filing | 506 | 0.79 | 0.38 | 0.73 |
| Piper Rudnick | Jun 2002 | Named in a filing | 183 | 1.09 | 0.37 | 0.82 |
| Piper & Marbury L.L.P. | Nov 1997 | Named in a filing | 143 | 1.05 | 1.33 | 0.89 |
| Paul Hastings | May 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 768 | 0.98 | 0.72 | 1.09 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Dec 2013 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Morgan Lewis | Nov 2008 | Text search only | 1,028 | 1.18 | 0.31 | 1.02 |
| Edwards & Angell | Oct 2001 | Text search only | 81 | 0.68 | 0.59 | 1.15 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Michael E. McTiernanHogan Lovells US LLPFirst linked Nov 2023 · Named in a filing · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.20× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Brandon J. BortnerPaul HastingsFirst linked Jul 2022 · Named in a filing · 36 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.20× · Went dark 1.54× · 95% wipeout 1.32×
- Frank LopezPaul HastingsFirst linked Feb 2021 · Named in a filing · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.36× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- James M. Shea Jr.Paul HastingsFirst linked Feb 2021 · Named in a filing · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- Elizabeth NoePaul HastingsFirst linked Sep 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.36× · Went dark 2.59× · 95% wipeout 1.46×
- Scott R. SaksNorton RoseFirst linked Jul 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.74×
- Mark SchonbergerGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Oct 2001 · Named in SEC correspondence · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Barry A. BrooksPaul HastingsFirst linked Jun 1997 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.67× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Keith D. PisaniPaul HastingsFirst linked Dec 2008 · Text search only · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.32× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- William F. SchwitterPaul HastingsFirst linked Sep 2006 · Text search only · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael E. McTiernanHogan Lovells US LLP | Nov 2023 | Named in a filing | 15 | 1.20 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Brandon J. BortnerPaul Hastings | Jul 2022 | Named in a filing | 36 | 1.20 | 1.54 | 1.32 |
| Frank LopezPaul Hastings | Feb 2021 | Named in a filing | 27 | 2.36 | 0.00 | 1.20 |
| James M. Shea Jr.Paul Hastings | Feb 2021 | Named in a filing | 17 | 0.93 | 0.00 | 0.82 |
| Elizabeth NoePaul Hastings | Sep 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 24 | 1.36 | 2.59 | 1.46 |
| Scott R. SaksNorton Rose | Jul 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.74 |
| Mark SchonbergerGoodwin Procter | Oct 2001 | Named in SEC correspondence | 10 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.14 |
| Barry A. BrooksPaul Hastings | Jun 1997 | Named in a filing | 7 | 1.67 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Keith D. PisaniPaul Hastings | Dec 2008 | Text search only | 22 | 0.32 | 0.00 | 0.80 |
| William F. SchwitterPaul Hastings | Sep 2006 | Text search only | 24 | 1.46 | 0.00 | 1.21 |