KEURIG GREEN MOUNTAIN, INC. GMCR (last ticker on record)
CIK 909954Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Restatement
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Aug 2015
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 10-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Baker & McKenzieFirst linked Mar 2014 · Named in a filing · 587 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Ropes & GrayFirst linked Jun 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 914 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Merritt & MerrittFirst linked Oct 1998 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.86× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- Rubin Baum Levin Constant & FriedmanFirst linked Jun 1997 · Named in a filing · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.45× · Went dark 1.91× · 95% wipeout 1.31×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baker & McKenzie | Mar 2014 | Named in a filing | 587 | 1.07 | 0.72 | 1.00 |
| Ropes & Gray | Jun 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 914 | 0.98 | 0.14 | 0.92 |
| Merritt & Merritt | Oct 1998 | Named in a filing | 5 | 1.86 | 0.00 | 1.35 |
| Rubin Baum Levin Constant & Friedman | Jun 1997 | Named in a filing | 17 | 1.45 | 1.91 | 1.31 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Christopher M. BartoliBaker & McKenzieFirst linked Mar 2014 · Named in a filing · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.69× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.40×
- Jane D. GoldsteinRopes & GrayFirst linked Jun 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.41× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.56×
- H. Kenneth Merritt Jr.Merritt & MerrittFirst linked Apr 2000 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.56× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Denise M. TormeySNR Denton US LLPFirst linked Jun 1997 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.77× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.61×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Christopher M. BartoliBaker & McKenzie | Mar 2014 | Named in a filing | 21 | 0.69 | 0.00 | 1.40 |
| Jane D. GoldsteinRopes & Gray | Jun 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 22 | 0.41 | 0.00 | 0.56 |
| H. Kenneth Merritt Jr.Merritt & Merritt | Apr 2000 | Named in a filing | 6 | 1.56 | 0.00 | 1.24 |
| Denise M. TormeySNR Denton US LLP | Jun 1997 | Named in a filing | 7 | 0.77 | 0.00 | 1.61 |