COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP /NEW COST (last ticker on record)
CIK 909832Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Nov 2006
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a grand jury subpoenaForm 10-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Perkins CoieFirst linked Nov 2012 · Named in a filing · 511 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLPFirst linked Mar 2010 · Named in a filing · 130 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.59× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- Heller EhrmanFirst linked Oct 2001 · Named in SEC correspondence · 256 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.76× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Foster PepperFirst linked May 1995 · Named in SEC correspondence · 43 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.81× · Went dark 0.62× · 95% wipeout 1.92×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perkins Coie | Nov 2012 | Named in a filing | 511 | 0.93 | 0.27 | 0.98 |
| Davis Wright Tremaine LLP | Mar 2010 | Named in a filing | 130 | 0.97 | 0.59 | 1.27 |
| Heller Ehrman | Oct 2001 | Named in SEC correspondence | 256 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.96 |
| Foster Pepper | May 1995 | Named in SEC correspondence | 43 | 0.81 | 0.62 | 1.92 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Christopher WassmanPerkins CoieFirst linked Jun 2026 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- J. Sue MorganPerkins CoieFirst linked Mar 2013 · Named in a filing · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.16× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.48×
- Andrew B. MoorePerkins CoieFirst linked Nov 2012 · Named in a filing · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.26× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- STEWART M. LANDEFELDPerkins CoieFirst linked Nov 2012 · Named in a filing · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- David R. WilsonHeller EhrmanFirst linked May 1995 · Named in SEC correspondence · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 1.29× · 95% wipeout 1.56×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Christopher WassmanPerkins Coie | Jun 2026 | Named in a filing | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| J. Sue MorganPerkins Coie | Mar 2013 | Named in a filing | 23 | 1.16 | 0.00 | 0.48 |
| Andrew B. MoorePerkins Coie | Nov 2012 | Named in a filing | 26 | 0.26 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| STEWART M. LANDEFELDPerkins Coie | Nov 2012 | Named in a filing | 15 | 1.03 | 0.00 | 0.77 |
| David R. WilsonHeller Ehrman | May 1995 | Named in SEC correspondence | 25 | 1.00 | 1.29 | 1.56 |