IPC HOLDINGS LTD IPCR (last ticker on record)
CIK 909815Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked May 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,397 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- Cahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Apr 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 598 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.75×
- MELLO JONES & MARTINFirst linked Mar 2009 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.58× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Conyers Dill & PearmanFirst linked Dec 1996 · Named in a filing · 531 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Dec 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | May 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,397 | 1.27 | 0.11 | 0.88 |
| Cahill Gordon & Reindel | Apr 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 598 | 1.03 | 0.18 | 0.75 |
| MELLO JONES & MARTIN | Mar 2009 | Named in a filing | 8 | 0.58 | 0.00 | 0.98 |
| Conyers Dill & Pearman | Dec 1996 | Named in a filing | 531 | 0.89 | 0.35 | 1.14 |
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Dec 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.66 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Gary I. HorowitzSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked May 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 53 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.39× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.72×
- Michael A. BeckerCahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked May 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.62× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.93×
- John SchusterCahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Apr 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.57× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.43×
- Melissa SawyerSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Mar 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Andrew S. RowenSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Dec 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.92× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Helene R. BanksCahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Apr 2009 · Text search only · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.75× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.19×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gary I. HorowitzSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | May 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 53 | 1.39 | 0.00 | 0.72 |
| Michael A. BeckerCahill Gordon & Reindel | May 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 1.62 | 0.00 | 2.93 |
| John SchusterCahill Gordon & Reindel | Apr 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 19 | 0.57 | 0.00 | 0.43 |
| Melissa SawyerSullivan & Cromwell | Mar 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 17 | 1.07 | 0.00 | 1.25 |
| Andrew S. RowenSullivan & Cromwell | Dec 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 1.92 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Helene R. BanksCahill Gordon & Reindel | Apr 2009 | Text search only | 9 | 0.75 | 0.00 | 1.19 |