ASYST TECHNOLOGIES INC ASYT (last ticker on record)
CIK 909326Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Restatement
- 95% wipeout
- Restructuring
- Bankruptcy
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 5
- Newest began Apr 2009
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Nov 2003 to Dec 2009
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a grand jury subpoenaForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Baker & McKenzieFirst linked Jan 2005 · Named in a filing · 587 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Dec 1996 · Named in a filing · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Winstead PCFirst linked Jul 2002 · Text search only · 121 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 0.85× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- Brown & WoodFirst linked Sep 2001 · Text search only · 299 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.53× · Went dark 0.47× · 95% wipeout 0.58×
- Sidley AustinFirst linked Sep 2001 · Text search only · 1,210 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Steptoe & JohnsonFirst linked Feb 2001 · Text search only · 80 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.65× · 95% wipeout 1.34×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baker & McKenzie | Jan 2005 | Named in a filing | 587 | 1.07 | 0.72 | 1.00 |
| Cooley LLP | Dec 1996 | Named in a filing | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| Winstead PC | Jul 2002 | Text search only | 121 | 1.19 | 0.85 | 1.27 |
| Brown & Wood | Sep 2001 | Text search only | 299 | 1.53 | 0.47 | 0.58 |
| Sidley Austin | Sep 2001 | Text search only | 1,210 | 1.30 | 0.14 | 0.93 |
| Steptoe & Johnson | Feb 2001 | Text search only | 80 | 1.10 | 0.65 | 1.34 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Nancy H. WojtasCooley LLPFirst linked Oct 2003 · Named in a filing · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.58×
- Michael L. WeinerCooley LLPFirst linked Oct 1999 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 1.93× · 95% wipeout 1.48×
- James C. KitchCooley LLPFirst linked Dec 1996 · Named in a filing · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.73× · Went dark 1.10× · 95% wipeout 1.70×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nancy H. WojtasCooley LLP | Oct 2003 | Named in a filing | 26 | 2.00 | 0.00 | 1.58 |
| Michael L. WeinerCooley LLP | Oct 1999 | Named in a filing | 11 | 0.89 | 1.93 | 1.48 |
| James C. KitchCooley LLP | Dec 1996 | Named in a filing | 19 | 0.73 | 1.10 | 1.70 |