CAPTIVA SOFTWARE CORP CPTV (last ticker on record)
CIK 909276Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Apr 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Gunderson DettmerFirst linked Aug 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 333 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.66× · 95% wipeout 1.32×
- SEC ATTORNEYSFirst linked Sep 2005 · Text search only · 31 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 1.73× · 95% wipeout 0.56×
- Cleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Apr 2004 · Text search only · 741 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.12× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- VILLENEUVE FRANKLIN & HACHIGANFirst linked Apr 2002 · Text search only · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.46× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Apr 2002 · Text search only · 1,468 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cooley LLP | Apr 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| Gunderson Dettmer | Aug 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 333 | 1.17 | 0.66 | 1.32 |
| SEC ATTORNEYS | Sep 2005 | Text search only | 31 | 1.18 | 1.73 | 0.56 |
| Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Apr 2004 | Text search only | 741 | 1.31 | 0.12 | 0.76 |
| VILLENEUVE FRANKLIN & HACHIGAN | Apr 2002 | Text search only | 5 | 3.46 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Apr 2002 | Text search only | 1,468 | 1.09 | 0.60 | 1.42 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Lance W. BridgesCooley LLPFirst linked Aug 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.70× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Christopher D. DillonShearman & SterlingFirst linked Apr 2002 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.91× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Jay K. HachigianGunderson DettmerFirst linked Aug 2001 · Named in a filing · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.27× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.68×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lance W. BridgesCooley LLP | Aug 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 0.70 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Christopher D. DillonShearman & Sterling | Apr 2002 | Named in a filing | 10 | 1.91 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Jay K. HachigianGunderson Dettmer | Aug 2001 | Named in a filing | 30 | 0.27 | 0.00 | 0.68 |