LANDRYS RESTAURANTS INC LNY (last ticker on record)
CIK 908652Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restructuring
- Restatement
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Nov 2009
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 11
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Olshan Frome Wolosky LLPFirst linked Jul 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 390 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.38× · Went dark 0.86× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Haynes and BooneFirst linked Dec 2001 · Named in SEC correspondence · 353 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.56× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Mar 2000 · Named in a filing · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Akerman LLPFirst linked May 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 211 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.67× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
- Winstead PCFirst linked May 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 121 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 0.85× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- Pillsbury WinthropFirst linked Sep 2010 · Text search only · 516 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- Cadwalader Wickersham & TaftFirst linked Dec 2009 · Text search only · 305 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.24× · 95% wipeout 0.95×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked May 2009 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Proskauer RoseFirst linked Dec 2008 · Text search only · 492 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.48× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Paul HastingsFirst linked Jun 2008 · Text search only · 768 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
- Willkie FarrFirst linked Mar 2007 · Text search only · 539 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.40× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Olshan Frome Wolosky LLP | Jul 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 390 | 1.38 | 0.86 | 1.22 |
| Haynes and Boone | Dec 2001 | Named in SEC correspondence | 353 | 1.03 | 0.56 | 0.84 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Mar 2000 | Named in a filing | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.85 |
| Akerman LLP | May 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 211 | 1.09 | 0.67 | 1.36 |
| Winstead PC | May 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 121 | 1.19 | 0.85 | 1.27 |
| Pillsbury Winthrop | Sep 2010 | Text search only | 516 | 1.13 | 0.82 | 1.27 |
| Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft | Dec 2009 | Text search only | 305 | 1.14 | 0.24 | 0.95 |
| Shearman & Sterling | May 2009 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Proskauer Rose | Dec 2008 | Text search only | 492 | 1.15 | 0.48 | 1.08 |
| Paul Hastings | Jun 2008 | Text search only | 768 | 0.98 | 0.72 | 1.09 |
| Willkie Farr | Mar 2007 | Text search only | 539 | 1.23 | 0.40 | 0.84 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Bill NelsonShearman & SterlingFirst linked May 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.81×
- Steve WoloskyOlshan Frome Wolosky LLPFirst linked Jul 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 95 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.71× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- Paul T. SchnellSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Mar 2000 · Named in a filing · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.07× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.23×
- ARTHUR S. BERNERWinstead PCFirst linked May 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.52× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- William B. NelsonHaynes and BooneFirst linked Jun 2009 · Text search only · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.74×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bill NelsonShearman & Sterling | May 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 29 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.81 |
| Steve WoloskyOlshan Frome Wolosky LLP | Jul 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 95 | 1.71 | 0.37 | 0.90 |
| Paul T. SchnellSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Mar 2000 | Named in a filing | 37 | 2.07 | 0.00 | 0.23 |
| ARTHUR S. BERNERWinstead PC | May 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 2.52 | 0.00 | 0.98 |
| William B. NelsonHaynes and Boone | Jun 2009 | Text search only | 37 | 1.27 | 0.00 | 0.74 |