Plures Technologies, Inc./DE MANY (last ticker on record)
CIK 907686Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Feb 2014
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Ruskin Moscou Faltischek, P.C.First linked Sep 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 51 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.95× · 95% wipeout 1.31×
- Haynes and BooneFirst linked Sep 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 353 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.56× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- TroyGould PCFirst linked Feb 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 125 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.73× · Went dark 1.37× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Loeb & Loeb LLPFirst linked May 2000 · Named in a filing · 838 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.99× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Jeffer MangelsFirst linked Oct 2004 · Text search only · 45 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.52× · Went dark 1.35× · 95% wipeout 2.00×
- K&L GatesFirst linked Oct 2004 · Text search only · 723 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 1.35× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ruskin Moscou Faltischek, P.C. | Sep 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 51 | 1.26 | 0.95 | 1.31 |
| Haynes and Boone | Sep 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 353 | 1.03 | 0.56 | 0.84 |
| TroyGould PC | Feb 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 125 | 0.73 | 1.37 | 1.25 |
| Loeb & Loeb LLP | May 2000 | Named in a filing | 838 | 0.92 | 0.99 | 1.10 |
| Jeffer Mangels | Oct 2004 | Text search only | 45 | 0.52 | 1.35 | 2.00 |
| K&L Gates | Oct 2004 | Text search only | 723 | 1.06 | 1.35 | 1.18 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- DAVID H. ODENHaynes and BooneFirst linked Sep 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.20× · Went dark 1.53× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- David L. FicksmanTroyGould PCFirst linked May 2000 · Named in SEC correspondence · 58 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.91× · Went dark 1.80× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DAVID H. ODENHaynes and Boone | Sep 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 1.20 | 1.53 | 0.00 |
| David L. FicksmanTroyGould PC | May 2000 | Named in SEC correspondence | 58 | 0.91 | 1.80 | 0.96 |