NEKTAR THERAPEUTICS NKTR (last ticker on record)
CIK 906709Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- 95% wipeout
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began May 2022
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Mar 2018 to Nov 2023
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Aug 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Sidley AustinFirst linked Aug 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,210 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- O Melveny & Myers LLPFirst linked Aug 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 589 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.25× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Jul 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Lowenstein SandlerFirst linked Mar 2025 · Text search only · 297 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.70× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
- Brown & WoodFirst linked Jan 2001 · Text search only · 299 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.53× · Went dark 0.47× · 95% wipeout 0.58×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goodwin Procter | Aug 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| Sidley Austin | Aug 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,210 | 1.30 | 0.14 | 0.93 |
| O Melveny & Myers LLP | Aug 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 589 | 1.07 | 0.25 | 1.07 |
| Cooley LLP | Jul 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| Lowenstein Sandler | Mar 2025 | Text search only | 297 | 1.12 | 0.70 | 1.42 |
| Brown & Wood | Jan 2001 | Text search only | 299 | 1.53 | 0.47 | 0.58 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Justin PlattGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Mar 2025 · Named in SEC correspondence · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.53×
- Mitchell S. BloomGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Nov 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 109 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.38× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Eric C. SibbittO Melveny & Myers LLPFirst linked Jan 2014 · Named in a filing · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.29× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.48×
- Sam ZuckerGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Aug 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- Nancy H. WojtasCooley LLPFirst linked Aug 2001 · Named in a filing · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.58×
- John M. GeschkeCooley LLPFirst linked Oct 1997 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
- Vincent P. PangrazioCooley LLPFirst linked Oct 1997 · Named in a filing · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.48× · Went dark 1.49× · 95% wipeout 1.29×
- Mark P. TanouryCooley LLPFirst linked Jul 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 36 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.42× · Went dark 0.54× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Justin PlattGoodwin Procter | Mar 2025 | Named in SEC correspondence | 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.53 |
| Mitchell S. BloomGoodwin Procter | Nov 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 109 | 0.38 | 0.00 | 1.03 |
| Eric C. SibbittO Melveny & Myers LLP | Jan 2014 | Named in a filing | 15 | 2.29 | 0.00 | 1.48 |
| Sam ZuckerGoodwin Procter | Aug 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.11 |
| Nancy H. WojtasCooley LLP | Aug 2001 | Named in a filing | 26 | 2.00 | 0.00 | 1.58 |
| John M. GeschkeCooley LLP | Oct 1997 | Named in a filing | 12 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.42 |
| Vincent P. PangrazioCooley LLP | Oct 1997 | Named in a filing | 14 | 0.48 | 1.49 | 1.29 |
| Mark P. TanouryCooley LLP | Jul 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 36 | 0.42 | 0.54 | 1.20 |