SRA INTERNATIONAL, INC. SRX (last ticker on record)
CIK 906192Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 12
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- McGuireWoods LLPFirst linked May 2012 · Named in a filing · 358 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.85× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- Dewey & LeBoeuf LLPFirst linked May 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 126 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.60× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.15×
- Debevoise & PlimptonFirst linked Apr 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 424 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Apr 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,125 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.20× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Apr 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Arnold & PorterFirst linked Nov 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 254 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- HALE AND DORRFirst linked Mar 2002 · Named in a filing · 665 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Kilpatrick StocktonFirst linked Mar 2012 · Text search only · 191 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Mar 2012 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Cahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Apr 2011 · Text search only · 598 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Apr 2002 · Text search only · 826 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.83×
- WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Mar 2002 · Text search only · 662 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| McGuireWoods LLP | May 2012 | Named in a filing | 358 | 0.97 | 0.85 | 1.11 |
| Dewey & LeBoeuf LLP | May 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 126 | 1.60 | 0.00 | 0.15 |
| Debevoise & Plimpton | Apr 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 424 | 1.10 | 0.14 | 1.04 |
| Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Apr 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,125 | 1.23 | 0.20 | 0.96 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Apr 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Arnold & Porter | Nov 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 254 | 1.03 | 0.11 | 0.84 |
| HALE AND DORR | Mar 2002 | Named in a filing | 665 | 1.06 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
| Kilpatrick Stockton | Mar 2012 | Text search only | 191 | 0.88 | 0.37 | 0.91 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Mar 2012 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Cahill Gordon & Reindel | Apr 2011 | Text search only | 598 | 1.03 | 0.18 | 0.77 |
| Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Apr 2002 | Text search only | 826 | 1.02 | 0.18 | 0.83 |
| WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Mar 2002 | Text search only | 662 | 1.14 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Richard E. BaltzArnold & PorterFirst linked Mar 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.35× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- GEORGE P. STAMASWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Apr 2011 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.59× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.22×
- Stephen I. GloverGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Apr 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 31 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.56× · Went dark 1.39× · 95% wipeout 0.61×
- William D. RegnerDebevoise & PlimptonFirst linked Apr 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.98× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- Brent B. SilerCooley LLPFirst linked Mar 2002 · Named in a filing · 51 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.40× · Went dark 0.57× · 95% wipeout 1.70×
- DAVID SYLVESTERHALE AND DORRFirst linked Mar 2002 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.45× · Went dark 1.54× · 95% wipeout 2.52×
- Jonathan F. LewisDebevoise & PlimptonFirst linked Mar 2012 · Text search only · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.33×
- Andrew HermanKirkland & EllisFirst linked Apr 2011 · Text search only · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.17× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- DOUGLAS A. CIFUPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Apr 2002 · Text search only · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.58×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richard E. BaltzArnold & Porter | Mar 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 22 | 0.35 | 0.00 | 0.59 |
| GEORGE P. STAMASWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Apr 2011 | Named in a filing | 12 | 0.59 | 0.00 | 2.22 |
| Stephen I. GloverGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Apr 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 31 | 1.56 | 1.39 | 0.61 |
| William D. RegnerDebevoise & Plimpton | Apr 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 16 | 1.98 | 0.00 | 1.12 |
| Brent B. SilerCooley LLP | Mar 2002 | Named in a filing | 51 | 0.40 | 0.57 | 1.70 |
| DAVID SYLVESTERHALE AND DORR | Mar 2002 | Named in a filing | 12 | 1.45 | 1.54 | 2.52 |
| Jonathan F. LewisDebevoise & Plimpton | Mar 2012 | Text search only | 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.33 |
| Andrew HermanKirkland & Ellis | Apr 2011 | Text search only | 8 | 2.17 | 0.00 | 1.15 |
| DOUGLAS A. CIFUPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Apr 2002 | Text search only | 26 | 1.28 | 0.00 | 0.58 |