NVR INC NVR (last ticker on record)
CIK 906163Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Mar 2006
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Hogan Lovells US LLPFirst linked May 2010 · Named in a filing · 487 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Hunton & WilliamsFirst linked Jun 1999 · Named in a filing · 404 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.36× · 95% wipeout 0.65×
- Hogan & HartsonFirst linked May 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 390 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.30× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hogan Lovells US LLP | May 2010 | Named in a filing | 487 | 0.96 | 0.26 | 0.85 |
| Hunton & Williams | Jun 1999 | Named in a filing | 404 | 1.06 | 0.36 | 0.65 |
| Hogan & Hartson | May 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 390 | 1.03 | 0.30 | 1.18 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Carol D. GoldFirst linked Feb 2002 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Alan L. DyeHogan & HartsonFirst linked Mar 2001 · Named in a filing · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.56× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Suzanne A. BarrHogan & HartsonFirst linked Mar 2001 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.28×
- Eve N. HowardHogan Lovells US LLPFirst linked May 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- J. Warren Gorrell Jr.Hogan & HartsonFirst linked May 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carol D. Gold | Feb 2002 | Named in a filing | 6 | 1.13 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Alan L. DyeHogan & Hartson | Mar 2001 | Named in a filing | 17 | 0.56 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Suzanne A. BarrHogan & Hartson | Mar 2001 | Named in a filing | 5 | 1.13 | 0.00 | 2.28 |
| Eve N. HowardHogan Lovells US LLP | May 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 13 | 1.46 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| J. Warren Gorrell Jr.Hogan & Hartson | May 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 26 | 1.27 | 0.00 | 0.00 |