rEVO Biologics, Inc. GTCB (last ticker on record)
CIK 904973Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Jun 2010
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Jan 2004 to Oct 2010
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Nov 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Edwards Angell Palmer & DodgeFirst linked Dec 2005 · Named in a filing · 76 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.83× · Went dark 0.66× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
- Palmer & DodgeFirst linked May 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 98 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.75× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Bingham McCutchenFirst linked Nov 2010 · Text search only · 291 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.38× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Paul HastingsFirst linked Nov 2010 · Text search only · 768 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
- Edwards & AngellFirst linked Jun 2006 · Text search only · 81 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.68× · Went dark 0.59× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goodwin Procter | Nov 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| Edwards Angell Palmer & Dodge | Dec 2005 | Named in a filing | 76 | 0.83 | 0.66 | 1.38 |
| Palmer & Dodge | May 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 98 | 0.89 | 0.75 | 0.99 |
| Bingham McCutchen | Nov 2010 | Text search only | 291 | 0.94 | 0.38 | 1.06 |
| Paul Hastings | Nov 2010 | Text search only | 768 | 0.98 | 0.72 | 1.09 |
| Edwards & Angell | Jun 2006 | Text search only | 81 | 0.68 | 0.59 | 1.15 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Arthur R. McGivernGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Apr 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 32 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.65× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Michael H. BisonGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Apr 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.85× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Stuart M. CableGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Apr 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 59 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.66× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
- Nathaniel S. GardinerPalmer & DodgeFirst linked Jun 2002 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.19×
- John J. Concannon IIIBingham McCutchenFirst linked Nov 2010 · Text search only · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.19×
- Brian P. KeaneMintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.First linked Dec 2006 · Text search only · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.32×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arthur R. McGivernGoodwin Procter | Apr 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 32 | 0.65 | 0.00 | 1.24 |
| Michael H. BisonGoodwin Procter | Apr 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 29 | 1.85 | 0.00 | 1.22 |
| Stuart M. CableGoodwin Procter | Apr 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 59 | 0.66 | 0.00 | 1.09 |
| Nathaniel S. GardinerPalmer & Dodge | Jun 2002 | Named in a filing | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.19 |
| John J. Concannon IIIBingham McCutchen | Nov 2010 | Text search only | 11 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.19 |
| Brian P. KeaneMintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. | Dec 2006 | Text search only | 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.32 |