INNODATA INC INOD (last ticker on record)
CIK 903651Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Restatement
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Nov 2024
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- A filing mentions a grand jury subpoenaForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions an SEC subpoenaForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Morgan LewisFirst linked Nov 2019 · Named in a filing · 1,028 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Kramer Levin NaftalisFirst linked Jan 2005 · Named in a filing · 304 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.68× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Chadbourne & ParkeFirst linked Jan 2005 · Text search only · 110 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.64× · Went dark 0.62× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- White & CaseFirst linked Jan 2005 · Text search only · 907 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Morgan Lewis | Nov 2019 | Named in a filing | 1,028 | 1.18 | 0.31 | 1.02 |
| Kramer Levin Naftalis | Jan 2005 | Named in a filing | 304 | 0.95 | 0.68 | 1.16 |
| Chadbourne & Parke | Jan 2005 | Text search only | 110 | 1.64 | 0.62 | 0.87 |
| White & Case | Jan 2005 | Text search only | 907 | 1.04 | 0.33 | 0.91 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- David C. SchwartzDLA PiperFirst linked Jun 2021 · Named in a filing · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.60×
- PETER S. KOLEVZONKramer Levin NaftalisFirst linked Jan 2005 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.76× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.58×
- Oscar D. FolgerFirst linked Sep 1998 · Named in SEC correspondence · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.66× · Went dark 0.88× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David C. SchwartzDLA Piper | Jun 2021 | Named in a filing | 21 | 1.21 | 0.00 | 0.60 |
| PETER S. KOLEVZONKramer Levin Naftalis | Jan 2005 | Named in a filing | 12 | 0.76 | 0.00 | 0.58 |
| Oscar D. Folger | Sep 1998 | Named in SEC correspondence | 13 | 1.66 | 0.88 | 1.35 |