CHC HELICOPTER CORP FLI (last ticker on record)
CIK 903124Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Jun 2004 · Named in a filing · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- White & CaseFirst linked Jun 2004 · Named in a filing · 907 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Blake Cassels & GraydonFirst linked Jun 2004 · Text search only · 227 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.73× · Went dark 0.49× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Borden Ladner Gervais LLPFirst linked Jun 2004 · Text search only · 78 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.46× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Cahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Jun 2004 · Text search only · 598 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Davies Ward Phillips & VinebergFirst linked Jun 2004 · Text search only · 94 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.35× · Went dark 0.21× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- Ogilvy RenaultFirst linked Jun 2004 · Text search only · 53 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.56×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shearman & Sterling | Jun 2004 | Named in a filing | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| White & Case | Jun 2004 | Named in a filing | 907 | 1.04 | 0.33 | 0.91 |
| Blake Cassels & Graydon | Jun 2004 | Text search only | 227 | 0.73 | 0.49 | 0.80 |
| Borden Ladner Gervais LLP | Jun 2004 | Text search only | 78 | 0.46 | 0.00 | 1.25 |
| Cahill Gordon & Reindel | Jun 2004 | Text search only | 598 | 1.03 | 0.18 | 0.77 |
| Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg | Jun 2004 | Text search only | 94 | 0.35 | 0.21 | 1.11 |
| Ogilvy Renault | Jun 2004 | Text search only | 53 | 1.02 | 0.00 | 1.56 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Christopher C. PaciDLA PiperFirst linked Jun 2004 · Named in a filing · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.82×
- Christopher J. CummingsPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Sep 2005 · Text search only · 60 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.20× · Went dark 0.38× · 95% wipeout 0.74×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Christopher C. PaciDLA Piper | Jun 2004 | Named in a filing | 27 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.82 |
| Christopher J. CummingsPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Sep 2005 | Text search only | 60 | 1.20 | 0.38 | 0.74 |