ICAGEN INC ICGN (last ticker on record)
CIK 902622Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Nov 2008
- Largest fall in its shares
- 98%
- Aug 2005 to Sep 2010
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Ropes & GrayFirst linked Aug 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 914 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- HALE AND DORRFirst linked Apr 2004 · Named in a filing · 665 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Hutchison & MasonFirst linked Apr 2004 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 2.39× · 95% wipeout 1.89×
- WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Apr 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 662 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ropes & Gray | Aug 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 914 | 0.98 | 0.14 | 0.92 |
| HALE AND DORR | Apr 2004 | Named in a filing | 665 | 1.06 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
| Hutchison & Mason | Apr 2004 | Named in a filing | 9 | 0.89 | 2.39 | 1.89 |
| WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Apr 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 662 | 1.14 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Steven A. WilcoxRopes & GrayFirst linked Aug 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Stuart R. NaymanHALE AND DORRFirst linked Dec 2010 · Named in a filing · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.29× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.41×
- David E. RedlickWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Apr 2004 · Named in a filing · 51 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Hal J. LeibowitzWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Apr 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 39 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.59× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.81×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Steven A. WilcoxRopes & Gray | Aug 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| Stuart R. NaymanHALE AND DORR | Dec 2010 | Named in a filing | 23 | 0.29 | 0.00 | 0.41 |
| David E. RedlickWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Apr 2004 | Named in a filing | 51 | 1.24 | 0.33 | 1.01 |
| Hal J. LeibowitzWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Apr 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 39 | 0.59 | 0.00 | 0.81 |