LIBBEY INC LBY (last ticker on record)
CIK 902274Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Restructuring
- 95% wipeout
- Bankruptcy
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 4
- Newest began Jun 2020
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- May 2015 to Sep 2020
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Baker & HostetlerFirst linked Aug 2011 · Named in a filing · 231 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 1.12× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jan 1997 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Dec 2010 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Dykema GossettFirst linked Dec 2006 · Text search only · 115 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.23× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baker & Hostetler | Aug 2011 | Named in a filing | 231 | 1.11 | 1.12 | 1.35 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Jan 1997 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Dec 2010 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Dykema Gossett | Dec 2006 | Text search only | 115 | 0.95 | 0.23 | 0.87 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Christopher D. LuekingLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Feb 2003 · Named in SEC correspondence · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.61×
- John J. HuberLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Sep 2009 · Text search only · 61 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.74×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Christopher D. LuekingLatham & Watkins LLP | Feb 2003 | Named in SEC correspondence | 30 | 1.29 | 0.00 | 1.61 |
| John J. HuberLatham & Watkins LLP | Sep 2009 | Text search only | 61 | 1.12 | 0.00 | 1.74 |