PROLOGIS PLD (last ticker on record)
CIK 899881Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Jun 2008
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Far more SEC letters than usualSEC letter (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Dec 2001 · Named in a filing · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Mayer BrownFirst linked May 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 680 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Jun 2010 · Text search only · 1,468 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Apr 2006 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Jul 2005 · Text search only · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Dec 2001 | Named in a filing | 889 | 1.31 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
| Mayer Brown | May 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 680 | 0.98 | 0.34 | 0.94 |
| Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Jun 2010 | Text search only | 1,468 | 1.09 | 0.60 | 1.42 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Apr 2006 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Goodwin Procter | Jul 2005 | Text search only | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- David S. ThomasFirst linked Jun 2010 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.15× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Patrick J. SchultheisWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Jun 2010 · Named in a filing · 38 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.39×
- Philip J. NiehoffMayer BrownFirst linked Oct 1996 · Named in a filing · 38 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.68× · Went dark 0.66× · 95% wipeout 0.57×
- Edward J. SchneidmanMayer BrownFirst linked May 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.74× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.56×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David S. Thomas | Jun 2010 | Named in a filing | 9 | 2.15 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Patrick J. SchultheisWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Jun 2010 | Named in a filing | 38 | 1.02 | 0.72 | 1.39 |
| Philip J. NiehoffMayer Brown | Oct 1996 | Named in a filing | 38 | 1.68 | 0.66 | 0.57 |
| Edward J. SchneidmanMayer Brown | May 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 18 | 0.74 | 0.00 | 0.56 |