TITAN INTERNATIONAL INC TWI (last ticker on record)
CIK 899751Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Restatement
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Mar 2020
- Largest fall in its shares
- 96%
- Jul 2008 to May 2020
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Far more SEC letters than usualSEC letter (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Thompson CoburnFirst linked Nov 2024 · Named in SEC correspondence · 85 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 1.01× · 95% wipeout 1.33×
- Katten Muchin Rosenman LLPFirst linked Aug 2017 · Named in a filing · 268 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.76× · Went dark 0.58× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Davis & GilbertFirst linked May 2011 · Named in a filing · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.52× · Went dark 0.58× · 95% wipeout 1.52×
- Bodman LLPFirst linked Sep 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.05× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Sep 2004 · Named in a filing · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Armstrong TeasdaleFirst linked Feb 1997 · Named in a filing · 64 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.51×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thompson Coburn | Nov 2024 | Named in SEC correspondence | 85 | 1.13 | 1.01 | 1.33 |
| Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP | Aug 2017 | Named in a filing | 268 | 0.76 | 0.58 | 1.22 |
| Davis & Gilbert | May 2011 | Named in a filing | 20 | 1.52 | 0.58 | 1.52 |
| Bodman LLP | Sep 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 26 | 2.05 | 0.00 | 1.13 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Sep 2004 | Named in a filing | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Armstrong Teasdale | Feb 1997 | Named in a filing | 64 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.51 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- David J. KaufmanDuane MorrisFirst linked Nov 2024 · Named in SEC correspondence · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.38× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Lisa L. JacobsShearman & SterlingFirst linked Sep 2004 · Named in a filing · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- JOHN L. GILLIS JR.Armstrong TeasdaleFirst linked Feb 1997 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.69× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David J. KaufmanDuane Morris | Nov 2024 | Named in SEC correspondence | 18 | 0.38 | 0.00 | 0.98 |
| Lisa L. JacobsShearman & Sterling | Sep 2004 | Named in a filing | 25 | 1.10 | 0.00 | 1.02 |
| JOHN L. GILLIS JR.Armstrong Teasdale | Feb 1997 | Named in a filing | 10 | 1.69 | 0.00 | 2.00 |