TANGER INC. SKT (last ticker on record)
CIK 899715Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Oct 2005
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Troutman Pepper Locke LLPFirst linked Feb 2026 · Named in a filing · 90 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.14×
- Womble Bond Dickinson (US)First linked Mar 2018 · Named in a filing · 52 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, LLPFirst linked Dec 2013 · Named in a filing · 110 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.53× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Nov 1997 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Troutman Pepper Locke LLP | Feb 2026 | Named in a filing | 90 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.14 |
| Womble Bond Dickinson (US) | Mar 2018 | Named in a filing | 52 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.99 |
| Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, LLP | Dec 2013 | Named in a filing | 110 | 1.07 | 0.53 | 1.03 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Nov 1997 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Julia A. ThompsonLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Feb 2021 · Named in a filing · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.38× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- R. Charles Cassidy IIILatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Feb 2021 · Named in a filing · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.71×
- Gregory P. RodgersLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Apr 2009 · Named in a filing · 44 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.77× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.44×
- Joshua TinkelmanLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Aug 2006 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.62× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.11×
- Raymond Y. LinLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Nov 1997 · Named in SEC correspondence · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.32×
- John J. HuberLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Feb 2009 · Text search only · 61 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.74×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julia A. ThompsonLatham & Watkins LLP | Feb 2021 | Named in a filing | 30 | 0.38 | 0.00 | 1.08 |
| R. Charles Cassidy IIILatham & Watkins LLP | Feb 2021 | Named in a filing | 14 | 0.84 | 0.00 | 1.71 |
| Gregory P. RodgersLatham & Watkins LLP | Apr 2009 | Named in a filing | 44 | 0.77 | 0.00 | 1.44 |
| Joshua TinkelmanLatham & Watkins LLP | Aug 2006 | Named in a filing | 9 | 1.62 | 0.00 | 2.11 |
| Raymond Y. LinLatham & Watkins LLP | Nov 1997 | Named in SEC correspondence | 37 | 1.31 | 0.00 | 2.32 |
| John J. HuberLatham & Watkins LLP | Feb 2009 | Text search only | 61 | 1.12 | 0.00 | 1.74 |