CINERGY CORP CIN (last ticker on record)
CIK 899652Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Mar 2004
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- A filing mentions a grand jury subpoenaForm 10-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.First linked Nov 2001 · Named in a filing · 995 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.78×
- Thompson Hine LLPFirst linked Nov 2001 · Named in a filing · 208 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.64× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Jul 1998 · Named in a filing · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- Taft Stettinius & HollisterFirst linked Dec 1996 · Named in a filing · 94 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.64× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Jul 2001 · Text search only · 1,696 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. | Nov 2001 | Named in a filing | 995 | 1.46 | 0.37 | 0.78 |
| Thompson Hine LLP | Nov 2001 | Named in a filing | 208 | 0.95 | 0.64 | 1.06 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Jul 1998 | Named in a filing | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.82 |
| Taft Stettinius & Hollister | Dec 1996 | Named in a filing | 94 | 1.64 | 0.31 | 0.66 |
| Davis Polk | Jul 2001 | Text search only | 1,696 | 1.25 | 0.06 | 0.99 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Pankaj K. SinhaSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Jan 2000 · Named in a filing · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.82× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.72×
- Charles S. Whitman IIISullivan & CromwellFirst linked Apr 1999 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.92× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Deanna L. KirkpatrickDavis PolkFirst linked Nov 2001 · Text search only · 113 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.73× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.75×
- Paul L. ReynoldsGRAYDON, HEAD & RITCHEYFirst linked Jul 2001 · Text search only · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.76× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pankaj K. SinhaSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Jan 2000 | Named in a filing | 14 | 1.82 | 0.00 | 0.72 |
| Charles S. Whitman IIISullivan & Cromwell | Apr 1999 | Named in a filing | 9 | 3.92 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Deanna L. KirkpatrickDavis Polk | Nov 2001 | Text search only | 113 | 1.73 | 0.00 | 0.75 |
| Paul L. ReynoldsGRAYDON, HEAD & RITCHEY | Jul 2001 | Text search only | 7 | 2.76 | 0.00 | 1.24 |