LAMAR MEDIA CORP/DE
CIK 899045Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 11
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Locke LordFirst linked Jul 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 179 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.70× · Went dark 0.54× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Edwards Angell Palmer & DodgeFirst linked Oct 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 76 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.83× · Went dark 0.66× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
- Cahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Jan 2003 · Named in a filing · 598 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Chadbourne & ParkeFirst linked Nov 1996 · Named in a filing · 110 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.64× · Went dark 0.62× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Kean MillerFirst linked Nov 1996 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Palmer & DodgeFirst linked Jun 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 98 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.75× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Jul 2014 · Text search only · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Jul 2014 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Edwards Wildman PalmerFirst linked Jun 2012 · Text search only · 54 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 0.43× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Edwards & AngellFirst linked Oct 2006 · Text search only · 81 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.68× · Went dark 0.59× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloyFirst linked Mar 2003 · Text search only · 439 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Locke Lord | Jul 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 179 | 1.70 | 0.54 | 1.00 |
| Edwards Angell Palmer & Dodge | Oct 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 76 | 0.83 | 0.66 | 1.38 |
| Cahill Gordon & Reindel | Jan 2003 | Named in a filing | 598 | 1.03 | 0.18 | 0.77 |
| Chadbourne & Parke | Nov 1996 | Named in a filing | 110 | 1.64 | 0.62 | 0.87 |
| Kean Miller | Nov 1996 | Named in a filing | 10 | 0.94 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Palmer & Dodge | Jun 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 98 | 0.89 | 0.75 | 0.99 |
| Goodwin Procter | Jul 2014 | Text search only | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Jul 2014 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Edwards Wildman Palmer | Jun 2012 | Text search only | 54 | 0.88 | 0.43 | 0.80 |
| Edwards & Angell | Oct 2006 | Text search only | 81 | 0.68 | 0.59 | 1.15 |
| Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy | Mar 2003 | Text search only | 439 | 1.03 | 0.35 | 0.76 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Michelle EarleyLocke LordFirst linked Mar 2019 · Named in a filing · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 1.59× · 95% wipeout 2.86×
- David F. TaylorLocke LordFirst linked Jul 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 35 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.52× · Went dark 1.10× · 95% wipeout 2.68×
- Stacie S. AarestadFoley HoagFirst linked Dec 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.47× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- GEORGE TICKNORPalmer & DodgeFirst linked Jan 2003 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.78× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- STANLEY KELLERPalmer & DodgeFirst linked Jun 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Suzanne D. LecarozGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Jul 2014 · Text search only · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.75× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.74×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michelle EarleyLocke Lord | Mar 2019 | Named in a filing | 17 | 1.09 | 1.59 | 2.86 |
| David F. TaylorLocke Lord | Jul 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 35 | 1.52 | 1.10 | 2.68 |
| Stacie S. AarestadFoley Hoag | Dec 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 20 | 0.47 | 0.00 | 1.26 |
| GEORGE TICKNORPalmer & Dodge | Jan 2003 | Named in a filing | 9 | 0.78 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| STANLEY KELLERPalmer & Dodge | Jun 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 10 | 0.92 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Suzanne D. LecarozGoodwin Procter | Jul 2014 | Text search only | 13 | 0.75 | 0.00 | 0.74 |