SHARPS COMPLIANCE CORP SMED (last ticker on record)
CIK 898770Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began May 2022
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Norton RoseFirst linked Jun 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 304 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 0.52× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Fulbright & JaworskiFirst linked Nov 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 359 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.75× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- Epstein Becker & GreenFirst linked Nov 2008 · Named in a filing · 115 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.44× · Went dark 1.35× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Looper Reed & McGrawFirst linked Feb 2006 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.85×
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Aug 2022 · Text search only · 1,125 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.20× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- McDermott Will & EmeryFirst linked Nov 2009 · Text search only · 562 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Norton Rose | Jun 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 304 | 1.11 | 0.52 | 1.24 |
| Fulbright & Jaworski | Nov 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 359 | 1.10 | 0.75 | 1.35 |
| Epstein Becker & Green | Nov 2008 | Named in a filing | 115 | 1.44 | 1.35 | 1.14 |
| Looper Reed & McGraw | Feb 2006 | Named in a filing | 10 | 1.26 | 0.00 | 1.85 |
| Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Aug 2022 | Text search only | 1,125 | 1.23 | 0.20 | 0.96 |
| McDermott Will & Emery | Nov 2009 | Text search only | 562 | 0.97 | 0.60 | 1.14 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Brandon T. ByrneNorton RoseFirst linked Jun 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.55×
- Gene G. LewisFulbright & JaworskiFirst linked Nov 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brandon T. ByrneNorton Rose | Jun 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.55 |
| Gene G. LewisFulbright & Jaworski | Nov 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.09 |