PEERLESS SYSTEMS CORP PRLS (last ticker on record)
CIK 897893Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 11
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Reed SmithFirst linked Feb 2015 · Named in a filing · 487 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.77× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Robinson & Cole LLPFirst linked Jan 2015 · Named in a filing · 133 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.56× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- Foley & LardnerFirst linked Jun 2011 · Named in a filing · 498 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.71× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Kaye ScholerFirst linked Oct 2010 · Named in a filing · 161 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Loeb & Loeb LLPFirst linked Feb 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 838 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.99× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Sheppard MullinFirst linked May 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 392 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.81× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Dec 2003 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Paul HastingsFirst linked Mar 2001 · Named in a filing · 768 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
- Gunderson DettmerFirst linked Apr 1999 · Named in a filing · 333 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.66× · 95% wipeout 1.32×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Sep 1998 · Named in a filing · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Aug 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reed Smith | Feb 2015 | Named in a filing | 487 | 1.15 | 0.77 | 1.13 |
| Robinson & Cole LLP | Jan 2015 | Named in a filing | 133 | 0.95 | 0.56 | 0.88 |
| Foley & Lardner | Jun 2011 | Named in a filing | 498 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 1.02 |
| Kaye Scholer | Oct 2010 | Named in a filing | 161 | 0.88 | 1.03 | 1.00 |
| Loeb & Loeb LLP | Feb 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 838 | 0.92 | 0.99 | 1.10 |
| Sheppard Mullin | May 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 392 | 1.12 | 0.81 | 1.22 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Dec 2003 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Paul Hastings | Mar 2001 | Named in a filing | 768 | 0.98 | 0.72 | 1.09 |
| Gunderson Dettmer | Apr 1999 | Named in a filing | 333 | 1.17 | 0.66 | 1.32 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Sep 1998 | Named in a filing | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.85 |
| Cooley LLP | Aug 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Peter D. FetzerFoley & LardnerFirst linked Jun 2011 · Named in a filing · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.86× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.42×
- Steven CannerBaker & McKenzieFirst linked Oct 2010 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.89× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Gerald ChizeverLoeb & Loeb LLPFirst linked Feb 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.72× · Went dark 1.71× · 95% wipeout 0.71×
- Cary K. HydenLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Dec 2003 · Named in a filing · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.03× · Went dark 0.93× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- JEFFERY L. DONOVANFenwick & West LLPFirst linked Sep 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.70× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.75×
- Brett D. WhiteCooley LLPFirst linked Aug 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 55 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.27× · Went dark 0.84× · 95% wipeout 0.97×
- Gregory C. SmithSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Aug 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 28 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.52× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peter D. FetzerFoley & Lardner | Jun 2011 | Named in a filing | 26 | 0.86 | 0.00 | 0.42 |
| Steven CannerBaker & McKenzie | Oct 2010 | Named in a filing | 7 | 3.89 | 0.00 | 0.96 |
| Gerald ChizeverLoeb & Loeb LLP | Feb 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 12 | 0.72 | 1.71 | 0.71 |
| Cary K. HydenLatham & Watkins LLP | Dec 2003 | Named in a filing | 19 | 2.03 | 0.93 | 1.06 |
| JEFFERY L. DONOVANFenwick & West LLP | Sep 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 1.70 | 0.00 | 2.75 |
| Brett D. WhiteCooley LLP | Aug 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 55 | 0.27 | 0.84 | 0.97 |
| Gregory C. SmithSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Aug 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 28 | 0.52 | 0.60 | 1.14 |