STRATOSPHERE CORP
CIK 897743Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Jan 2010 · Text search only · 1,397 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLPFirst linked Sep 2009 · Text search only · 223 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.67× · Went dark 0.76× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Greenberg TraurigFirst linked Sep 2009 · Text search only · 1,225 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Sep 2009 · Text search only · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Aug 2004 · Text search only · 2,669 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Piper RudnickFirst linked Aug 2004 · Text search only · 183 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.78×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Aug 2004 · Text search only · 2,650 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Jan 2010 | Text search only | 1,397 | 1.27 | 0.11 | 0.88 |
| Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP | Sep 2009 | Text search only | 223 | 0.67 | 0.76 | 0.98 |
| Greenberg Traurig | Sep 2009 | Text search only | 1,225 | 1.01 | 1.03 | 1.12 |
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Sep 2009 | Text search only | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.66 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Aug 2004 | Text search only | 2,669 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.08 |
| Piper Rudnick | Aug 2004 | Text search only | 183 | 1.09 | 0.37 | 0.78 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Aug 2004 | Text search only | 2,650 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.84 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Anthony J. CollettaSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Sep 2009 · Text search only · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.54× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Neal McKnightSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Sep 2009 · Text search only · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.77× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.01×
- Raymond Y. LinLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Aug 2004 · Text search only · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.16×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anthony J. CollettaSullivan & Cromwell | Sep 2009 | Text search only | 6 | 1.54 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Neal McKnightSullivan & Cromwell | Sep 2009 | Text search only | 9 | 1.77 | 0.00 | 2.01 |
| Raymond Y. LinLatham & Watkins LLP | Aug 2004 | Text search only | 37 | 1.31 | 0.00 | 2.16 |