AMARIN CORP PLC\UK AMRN (last ticker on record)
CIK 897448Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Jun 2025
- Largest fall in its shares
- 98%
- Jul 2019 to Mar 2025
- Law firms
- 12
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 12
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the Justice DepartmentForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Ropes & GrayFirst linked Jan 2023 · Named in SEC correspondence · 914 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Nov 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Conyers Dill & PearmanFirst linked Jul 2006 · Named in a filing · 531 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Cahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Feb 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 598 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- K&L GatesFirst linked Mar 2005 · Named in a filing · 723 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 1.35× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Willkie FarrFirst linked Jan 2023 · Text search only · 539 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.40× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Arthur CoxFirst linked Dec 2016 · Text search only · 92 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.68× · Went dark 0.43× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- A&L GoodbodyFirst linked Dec 2009 · Text search only · 85 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.56×
- Preston Gates & EllisFirst linked Jun 2008 · Text search only · 159 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.36× · Went dark 1.62× · 95% wipeout 1.44×
- Hogan & HartsonFirst linked Dec 2004 · Text search only · 390 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.30× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Covington & BurlingFirst linked Apr 2003 · Text search only · 447 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Ziegler Ziegler & AssociatesFirst linked Apr 2003 · Text search only · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.62× · 95% wipeout 0.97×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ropes & Gray | Jan 2023 | Named in SEC correspondence | 914 | 0.98 | 0.14 | 0.92 |
| Goodwin Procter | Nov 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| Conyers Dill & Pearman | Jul 2006 | Named in a filing | 531 | 0.89 | 0.35 | 1.16 |
| Cahill Gordon & Reindel | Feb 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 598 | 1.03 | 0.18 | 0.77 |
| K&L Gates | Mar 2005 | Named in a filing | 723 | 1.06 | 1.35 | 1.18 |
| Willkie Farr | Jan 2023 | Text search only | 539 | 1.23 | 0.40 | 0.84 |
| Arthur Cox | Dec 2016 | Text search only | 92 | 0.68 | 0.43 | 0.91 |
| A&L Goodbody | Dec 2009 | Text search only | 85 | 1.14 | 0.00 | 0.56 |
| Preston Gates & Ellis | Jun 2008 | Text search only | 159 | 1.36 | 1.62 | 1.44 |
| Hogan & Hartson | Dec 2004 | Text search only | 390 | 1.03 | 0.30 | 1.18 |
| Covington & Burling | Apr 2003 | Text search only | 447 | 1.07 | 0.27 | 0.99 |
| Ziegler Ziegler & Associates | Apr 2003 | Text search only | 37 | 0.92 | 0.62 | 0.97 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jacqueline MercierGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Feb 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.85× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- William D. CollinsGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Apr 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.38× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- Arthur R. McGivernGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Mar 2011 · Named in a filing · 32 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.65× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Michael H. BisonGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Nov 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.85× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- William M. HartnettCahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Dec 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 40 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.16× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- Russell L. LeafWillkie FarrFirst linked Jan 2023 · Text search only · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
- James P. BarriGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Dec 2016 · Text search only · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.64× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.70×
- Geoffrey E. LiebmannCahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Jun 2008 · Text search only · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.16× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.47×
- Christopher T. CoxCadwalader Wickersham & TaftFirst linked Feb 2006 · Text search only · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.34× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.32×
- Brian J. LynchHogan & HartsonFirst linked Dec 2004 · Text search only · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Scott A. ZieglerZiegler Ziegler & AssociatesFirst linked Dec 2004 · Text search only · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.51× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
- THOMAS G. LYNCHFirst linked Feb 2001 · Text search only · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.75× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jacqueline MercierGoodwin Procter | Feb 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 18 | 0.85 | 0.00 | 0.59 |
| William D. CollinsGoodwin Procter | Apr 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 24 | 1.38 | 0.00 | 1.12 |
| Arthur R. McGivernGoodwin Procter | Mar 2011 | Named in a filing | 32 | 0.65 | 0.00 | 1.24 |
| Michael H. BisonGoodwin Procter | Nov 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 29 | 1.85 | 0.00 | 1.22 |
| William M. HartnettCahill Gordon & Reindel | Dec 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 40 | 0.16 | 0.00 | 1.15 |
| Russell L. LeafWillkie Farr | Jan 2023 | Text search only | 20 | 1.27 | 0.00 | 0.66 |
| James P. BarriGoodwin Procter | Dec 2016 | Text search only | 8 | 0.64 | 0.00 | 0.70 |
| Geoffrey E. LiebmannCahill Gordon & Reindel | Jun 2008 | Text search only | 10 | 1.16 | 0.00 | 1.47 |
| Christopher T. CoxCadwalader Wickersham & Taft | Feb 2006 | Text search only | 11 | 2.34 | 0.00 | 0.32 |
| Brian J. LynchHogan & Hartson | Dec 2004 | Text search only | 14 | 1.10 | 0.00 | 0.99 |
| Scott A. ZieglerZiegler Ziegler & Associates | Dec 2004 | Text search only | 8 | 1.51 | 0.00 | 1.38 |
| THOMAS G. LYNCH | Feb 2001 | Text search only | 5 | 2.75 | 0.00 | 0.66 |