AVID TECHNOLOGY, INC. AVID (last ticker on record)
CIK 896841Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Feb 2016
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a grand jury subpoenaForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Paul HastingsFirst linked Nov 2023 · Named in a filing · 768 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
- Covington & BurlingFirst linked Nov 2014 · Named in a filing · 447 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Aug 2004 · Named in a filing · 662 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- HALE AND DORRFirst linked Jul 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 665 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Piper RudnickFirst linked Apr 2005 · Text search only · 183 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paul Hastings | Nov 2023 | Named in a filing | 768 | 0.98 | 0.72 | 1.09 |
| Covington & Burling | Nov 2014 | Named in a filing | 447 | 1.07 | 0.27 | 0.99 |
| WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Aug 2004 | Named in a filing | 662 | 1.14 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
| HALE AND DORR | Jul 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 665 | 1.06 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
| Piper Rudnick | Apr 2005 | Text search only | 183 | 1.09 | 0.37 | 0.82 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Steve L. CamahortShearman & SterlingFirst linked Nov 2023 · Named in a filing · 56 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.50×
- David H. EngvallCovington & BurlingFirst linked Jun 2022 · Named in a filing · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.93× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.60×
- David A. WestenbergWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Aug 2004 · Named in a filing · 31 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Mark G. BordenWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked May 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 66 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.51× · Went dark 0.43× · 95% wipeout 1.62×
- Jay E. BothwickWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Apr 2005 · Text search only · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.57× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.58×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Steve L. CamahortShearman & Sterling | Nov 2023 | Named in a filing | 56 | 0.94 | 0.00 | 0.50 |
| David H. EngvallCovington & Burling | Jun 2022 | Named in a filing | 16 | 1.93 | 0.00 | 1.60 |
| David A. WestenbergWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Aug 2004 | Named in a filing | 31 | 1.04 | 0.00 | 1.16 |
| Mark G. BordenWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | May 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 66 | 1.51 | 0.43 | 1.62 |
| Jay E. BothwickWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Apr 2005 | Text search only | 27 | 1.57 | 0.00 | 0.58 |