AMERICAN BIO MEDICA CORP ABMC (last ticker on record)
CIK 896747Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restructuring
- 95% wipeout
- Went dark (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Jun 2021
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Jul 2020 to Dec 2022
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Olshan Frome Wolosky LLPFirst linked Apr 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 390 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.38× · Went dark 0.86× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Hopkins & SutterFirst linked Nov 1999 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.86× · Went dark 1.60× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- Fulbright & JaworskiFirst linked Sep 2001 · Text search only · 359 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.75× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Olshan Frome Wolosky LLP | Apr 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 390 | 1.38 | 0.86 | 1.22 |
| Hopkins & Sutter | Nov 1999 | Named in a filing | 12 | 0.86 | 1.60 | 0.82 |
| Fulbright & Jaworski | Sep 2001 | Text search only | 359 | 1.10 | 0.75 | 1.35 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Spencer G. FeldmanOlshan Frome Wolosky LLPFirst linked Apr 2014 · Named in a filing · 70 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.25× · Went dark 1.65× · 95% wipeout 1.59×
- Joel PensleyFirst linked Jan 1997 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.69× · Went dark 1.66× · 95% wipeout 1.57×
- Neil GoldFulbright & JaworskiFirst linked Sep 2001 · Text search only · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.50× · Went dark 2.51× · 95% wipeout 1.71×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spencer G. FeldmanOlshan Frome Wolosky LLP | Apr 2014 | Named in a filing | 70 | 2.25 | 1.65 | 1.59 |
| Joel Pensley | Jan 1997 | Named in a filing | 11 | 1.69 | 1.66 | 1.57 |
| Neil GoldFulbright & Jaworski | Sep 2001 | Text search only | 13 | 0.50 | 2.51 | 1.71 |