GEOGLOBAL RESOURCES INC. GBR (last ticker on record)
CIK 896726Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Went dark (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Sep 2010
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Jan 2006 to Nov 2016
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Nov 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 826 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.83×
- William S. Clarke, P.A.First linked Mar 1999 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 1.04× · 95% wipeout 2.19×
- Goodman and CarrFirst linked Nov 2005 · Text search only · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.73× · Went dark 4.24× · 95% wipeout 4.09×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Nov 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 826 | 1.02 | 0.18 | 0.83 |
| William S. Clarke, P.A. | Mar 1999 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 0.00 | 1.04 | 2.19 |
| Goodman and Carr | Nov 2005 | Text search only | 6 | 2.73 | 4.24 | 4.09 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Andrew J. FoleyPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Nov 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 33 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.46× · Went dark 0.78× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- William S. ClarkeWilliam S. Clarke, P.A.First linked Mar 1999 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 1.02× · 95% wipeout 2.11×
- WILLIAM S. CLARKE UIREWilliam S. Clarke, P.A.First linked Mar 1999 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 1.28× · 95% wipeout 1.43×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrew J. FoleyPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Nov 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 33 | 0.46 | 0.78 | 0.84 |
| William S. ClarkeWilliam S. Clarke, P.A. | Mar 1999 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 0.00 | 1.02 | 2.11 |
| WILLIAM S. CLARKE UIREWilliam S. Clarke, P.A. | Mar 1999 | Named in a filing | 5 | 0.00 | 1.28 | 1.43 |