GATEWAY INC GTW (last ticker on record)
CIK 895812Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Jan 2012
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative proceedingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC enforcement releaseSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a Wells noticeForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Sep 2007 · Named in a filing · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Mar 2005 · Named in a filing · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Winston & StrawnFirst linked Jul 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 585 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Mar 2005 · Text search only · 1,396 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Sep 2007 | Named in a filing | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.85 |
| Davis Polk | Mar 2005 | Named in a filing | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| Winston & Strawn | Jul 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 585 | 1.18 | 0.60 | 1.02 |
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Mar 2005 | Text search only | 1,396 | 1.28 | 0.11 | 0.92 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Brian J. McCarthySkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Sep 2007 · Named in a filing · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.36× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.81×
- David C. EismanSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Sep 2007 · Named in a filing · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.95× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.49×
- Stephanie G. HeimHogan & HartsonFirst linked Mar 2001 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.57× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- William H. Hinman Jr.Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Mar 2005 · Text search only · 39 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.18× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brian J. McCarthySkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Sep 2007 | Named in a filing | 30 | 1.36 | 0.00 | 0.81 |
| David C. EismanSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Sep 2007 | Named in a filing | 19 | 1.95 | 0.00 | 0.49 |
| Stephanie G. HeimHogan & Hartson | Mar 2001 | Named in a filing | 5 | 1.57 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| William H. Hinman Jr.Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Mar 2005 | Text search only | 39 | 2.18 | 0.00 | 1.11 |