ENBRIDGE INC ENB (last ticker on record)
CIK 895728Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 18
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 12
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Bracewell LLPFirst linked Oct 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 247 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Sidley AustinFirst linked Oct 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,210 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Haynes and BooneFirst linked Feb 2017 · Named in a filing · 353 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.56× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Sep 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Fulbright & JaworskiFirst linked Dec 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 359 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.75× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Feb 2005 · Named in a filing · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Feb 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- McCarthy TetraultFirst linked Jul 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 111 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.76× · Went dark 0.57× · 95% wipeout 1.41×
- Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked May 2002 · Named in a filing · 783 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Morris JamesFirst linked Oct 2018 · Text search only · 95 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.62× · Went dark 0.42× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Morris Nichols Arsht & TunnellFirst linked Oct 2018 · Text search only · 256 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.51× · Went dark 0.21× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
- Paul HastingsFirst linked Oct 2018 · Text search only · 768 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Oct 2018 · Text search only · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Dentons CanadaFirst linked Sep 2016 · Text search only · 49 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.80× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.45×
- Goodmans LLPFirst linked Sep 2016 · Text search only · 72 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.32× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Norton RoseFirst linked Sep 2016 · Text search only · 304 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 0.52× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Baker Botts L.L.P.First linked Jul 2002 · Text search only · 495 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.32× · Went dark 0.09× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Brunini Grantham Grower & HewesFirst linked Jul 2002 · Text search only · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bracewell LLP | Oct 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 247 | 0.93 | 0.31 | 1.03 |
| Sidley Austin | Oct 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,210 | 1.30 | 0.14 | 0.93 |
| Haynes and Boone | Feb 2017 | Named in a filing | 353 | 1.03 | 0.56 | 0.84 |
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Sep 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 889 | 1.31 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
| Fulbright & Jaworski | Dec 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 359 | 1.10 | 0.75 | 1.35 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Feb 2005 | Named in a filing | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Feb 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.69 |
| McCarthy Tetrault | Jul 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 111 | 0.76 | 0.57 | 1.41 |
| Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. | May 2002 | Named in a filing | 783 | 1.09 | 0.11 | 1.03 |
| Morris James | Oct 2018 | Text search only | 95 | 1.62 | 0.42 | 0.86 |
| Morris Nichols Arsht & Tunnell | Oct 2018 | Text search only | 256 | 1.51 | 0.21 | 0.89 |
| Paul Hastings | Oct 2018 | Text search only | 768 | 0.98 | 0.72 | 1.09 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Oct 2018 | Text search only | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.85 |
| Dentons Canada | Sep 2016 | Text search only | 49 | 0.80 | 0.00 | 1.45 |
| Goodmans LLP | Sep 2016 | Text search only | 72 | 1.03 | 0.32 | 1.01 |
| Norton Rose | Sep 2016 | Text search only | 304 | 1.11 | 0.52 | 1.24 |
| Baker Botts L.L.P. | Jul 2002 | Text search only | 495 | 1.32 | 0.09 | 1.03 |
| Brunini Grantham Grower & Hewes | Jul 2002 | Text search only | 15 | 1.12 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Catherine M. ClarkinSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Jul 2022 · Named in a filing · 52 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.52× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- William J. CooperAndrews Kurth LLPFirst linked Nov 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.72× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.31×
- William S. AndersonBracewell LLPFirst linked Oct 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.32× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- George J. SampasSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Sep 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.32× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Joseph B. FrumkinSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Sep 2016 · Named in a filing · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.91× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Laura J. McMahonFulbright & JaworskiFirst linked Dec 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.65× · Went dark 4.01× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Robert E. BuckholzSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Feb 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 39 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.39× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- William N. Finnegan IVLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked May 2002 · Named in a filing · 39 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.57× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- Daniel A. NeffWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Sep 2016 · Text search only · 75 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.42× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- David A. KatzWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Sep 2016 · Text search only · 108 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.44× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.70×
- Gregory E. OstlingWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Sep 2016 · Text search only · 44 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.52×
- Joshua DavidsonBaker Botts L.L.P.First linked Jul 2002 · Text search only · 42 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Catherine M. ClarkinSullivan & Cromwell | Jul 2022 | Named in a filing | 52 | 1.52 | 0.00 | 0.77 |
| William J. CooperAndrews Kurth LLP | Nov 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 0.72 | 0.00 | 1.31 |
| William S. AndersonBracewell LLP | Oct 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 20 | 0.32 | 0.00 | 1.03 |
| George J. SampasSullivan & Cromwell | Sep 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 14 | 1.32 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Joseph B. FrumkinSullivan & Cromwell | Sep 2016 | Named in a filing | 22 | 1.91 | 0.00 | 0.99 |
| Laura J. McMahonFulbright & Jaworski | Dec 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 0.65 | 4.01 | 0.00 |
| Robert E. BuckholzSullivan & Cromwell | Feb 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 39 | 2.39 | 0.00 | 0.93 |
| William N. Finnegan IVLatham & Watkins LLP | May 2002 | Named in a filing | 39 | 0.57 | 0.00 | 1.11 |
| Daniel A. NeffWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Sep 2016 | Text search only | 75 | 1.42 | 0.00 | 0.82 |
| David A. KatzWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Sep 2016 | Text search only | 108 | 1.44 | 0.00 | 0.70 |
| Gregory E. OstlingWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Sep 2016 | Text search only | 44 | 1.11 | 0.00 | 0.52 |
| Joshua DavidsonBaker Botts L.L.P. | Jul 2002 | Text search only | 42 | 1.01 | 0.00 | 0.87 |