JARDEN CORP JAH (last ticker on record)
CIK 895655Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jones DayFirst linked Mar 2016 · Named in a filing · 686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.54× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- Greenberg TraurigFirst linked Dec 2015 · Named in a filing · 1,223 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Kane Kessler, P.C.First linked May 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 58 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 1.59× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Ice MillerFirst linked May 1997 · Named in a filing · 112 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 0.21× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- K&L GatesFirst linked Oct 2003 · Text search only · 723 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 1.35× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Willkie FarrFirst linked Jul 2002 · Text search only · 539 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.40× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Jun 2002 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jones Day | Mar 2016 | Named in a filing | 686 | 1.25 | 0.54 | 1.12 |
| Greenberg Traurig | Dec 2015 | Named in a filing | 1,223 | 1.01 | 1.03 | 1.10 |
| Kane Kessler, P.C. | May 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 58 | 1.27 | 1.59 | 0.98 |
| Ice Miller | May 1997 | Named in a filing | 112 | 1.19 | 0.21 | 0.93 |
| K&L Gates | Oct 2003 | Text search only | 723 | 1.06 | 1.35 | 1.18 |
| Willkie Farr | Jul 2002 | Text search only | 539 | 1.23 | 0.40 | 0.84 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Jun 2002 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Joel T. MayBlake Cassels & GraydonFirst linked Apr 2016 · Named in a filing · 28 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.02× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Jeffrey S. TullmanKane Kessler, P.C.First linked Jan 2003 · Named in a filing · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.70× · Went dark 1.51× · 95% wipeout 0.34×
- Robert L. LawrenceKane Kessler, P.C.First linked Jun 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.35× · Went dark 0.99× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Joseph E. DeGroffIce MillerFirst linked Nov 1998 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joel T. MayBlake Cassels & Graydon | Apr 2016 | Named in a filing | 28 | 2.02 | 0.00 | 0.84 |
| Jeffrey S. TullmanKane Kessler, P.C. | Jan 2003 | Named in a filing | 15 | 1.70 | 1.51 | 0.34 |
| Robert L. LawrenceKane Kessler, P.C. | Jun 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 23 | 0.35 | 0.99 | 1.01 |
| Joseph E. DeGroffIce Miller | Nov 1998 | Named in a filing | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |