ENER1 INC HEV (last ticker on record)
CIK 895642Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Bankruptcy
- Restructuring
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 4
- Newest began Apr 2016
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 10
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Arnstein & Lehr LLPFirst linked Sep 2007 · Named in a filing · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.79× · Went dark 1.81× · 95% wipeout 1.80×
- MAZZEO SONGFirst linked Jun 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 4.15× · Went dark 1.29× · 95% wipeout 3.29×
- Adorno & Yoss, P.A.First linked Apr 2004 · Named in a filing · 49 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.62× · Went dark 1.01× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Feb 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,125 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.20× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- HUTCHINS, WHEELER & DITTMARFirst linked May 2000 · Named in a filing · 49 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.46× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Feldman WeinsteinFirst linked Jun 2007 · Text search only · 278 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 1.17× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Ballard SpahrFirst linked Feb 2007 · Text search only · 492 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 1.06× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
- Coudert BrothersFirst linked May 2005 · Text search only · 45 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.66× · Went dark 1.06× · 95% wipeout 1.29×
- Thompson & KnightFirst linked May 2005 · Text search only · 198 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.40× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
- Steel Hector & DavisFirst linked Feb 2004 · Text search only · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.36× · Went dark 0.58× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arnstein & Lehr LLP | Sep 2007 | Named in a filing | 29 | 1.79 | 1.81 | 1.80 |
| MAZZEO SONG | Jun 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 4.15 | 1.29 | 3.29 |
| Adorno & Yoss, P.A. | Apr 2004 | Named in a filing | 49 | 1.62 | 1.01 | 1.22 |
| Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Feb 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,125 | 1.23 | 0.20 | 0.96 |
| HUTCHINS, WHEELER & DITTMAR | May 2000 | Named in a filing | 49 | 0.46 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Feldman Weinstein | Jun 2007 | Text search only | 278 | 0.92 | 1.17 | 1.20 |
| Ballard Spahr | Feb 2007 | Text search only | 492 | 1.23 | 1.06 | 0.73 |
| Coudert Brothers | May 2005 | Text search only | 45 | 1.66 | 1.06 | 1.29 |
| Thompson & Knight | May 2005 | Text search only | 198 | 1.03 | 0.40 | 1.38 |
| Steel Hector & Davis | Feb 2004 | Text search only | 26 | 1.36 | 0.58 | 1.17 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- David S. SongMAZZEO SONGFirst linked Feb 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.62× · Went dark 1.65× · 95% wipeout 2.52×
- Brian LaneGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Jul 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 52 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.93× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.71×
- Stephen I. GloverGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Feb 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 31 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.56× · Went dark 1.39× · 95% wipeout 0.61×
- Francis J. Feeney Jr.DLA PiperFirst linked May 2000 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.36× · Went dark 1.05× · 95% wipeout 1.41×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David S. SongMAZZEO SONG | Feb 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 3.62 | 1.65 | 2.52 |
| Brian LaneGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Jul 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 52 | 1.93 | 0.00 | 0.71 |
| Stephen I. GloverGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Feb 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 31 | 1.56 | 1.39 | 0.61 |
| Francis J. Feeney Jr.DLA Piper | May 2000 | Named in a filing | 12 | 2.36 | 1.05 | 1.41 |