WILLBROS GROUP INC WG (last ticker on record)
CIK 895450Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Jun 2005
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Conner & WintersFirst linked Jun 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 66 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Brown & WoodFirst linked Apr 2002 · Text search only · 299 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.53× · Went dark 0.47× · 95% wipeout 0.58×
- CONNOR & WINTERSFirst linked Apr 2002 · Text search only · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Sidley AustinFirst linked Apr 2002 · Text search only · 1,210 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conner & Winters | Jun 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 66 | 1.06 | 0.19 | 1.00 |
| Brown & Wood | Apr 2002 | Text search only | 299 | 1.53 | 0.47 | 0.58 |
| CONNOR & WINTERS | Apr 2002 | Text search only | 7 | 0.99 | 0.00 | 0.59 |
| Sidley Austin | Apr 2002 | Text search only | 1,210 | 1.30 | 0.14 | 0.93 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Greg S. ScharlauConner & WintersFirst linked Jul 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.43× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.88×
- Mark D. BermanConner & WintersFirst linked May 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.76× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Robert J. MelgaardConner & WintersFirst linked Feb 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.79× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- ROBERT A. CURRYConner & WintersFirst linked Jun 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.80× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.54×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Greg S. ScharlauConner & Winters | Jul 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 10 | 1.43 | 0.00 | 1.88 |
| Mark D. BermanConner & Winters | May 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 1.76 | 0.00 | 1.10 |
| Robert J. MelgaardConner & Winters | Feb 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 15 | 1.79 | 0.00 | 1.18 |
| ROBERT A. CURRYConner & Winters | Jun 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 13 | 1.80 | 0.00 | 0.54 |