AZZ INC AZZ (last ticker on record)
CIK 8947Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Jun 2022
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Baker & McKenzieFirst linked Nov 2022 · Named in a filing · 587 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Kelly Hart & HallmanFirst linked Jan 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.57× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.74×
- Shannon, Gracey, Ratliff & Miller, L.L.P.First linked Dec 1999 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Conner & WintersFirst linked Jan 2011 · Text search only · 66 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Hall, Estill, Hardwick, Gable, Golden & Nelson, P.C.First linked Jan 2011 · Text search only · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.57× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baker & McKenzie | Nov 2022 | Named in a filing | 587 | 1.07 | 0.72 | 1.00 |
| Kelly Hart & Hallman | Jan 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 30 | 0.57 | 0.00 | 0.74 |
| Shannon, Gracey, Ratliff & Miller, L.L.P. | Dec 1999 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Conner & Winters | Jan 2011 | Text search only | 66 | 1.06 | 0.19 | 1.00 |
| Hall, Estill, Hardwick, Gable, Golden & Nelson, P.C. | Jan 2011 | Text search only | 27 | 0.57 | 0.55 | 1.07 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Roger W. BivansBaker & McKenzieFirst linked Jan 2024 · Named in a filing · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.65× · Went dark 1.43× · 95% wipeout 1.58×
- Jeremy L. MooreBaker & McKenzieFirst linked Nov 2022 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.74× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.70×
- F. Richard BernasekKelly Hart & HallmanFirst linked Jan 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roger W. BivansBaker & McKenzie | Jan 2024 | Named in a filing | 18 | 0.65 | 1.43 | 1.58 |
| Jeremy L. MooreBaker & McKenzie | Nov 2022 | Named in a filing | 10 | 0.74 | 0.00 | 1.70 |
| F. Richard BernasekKelly Hart & Hallman | Jan 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |