CitroTech Inc. CITR (last ticker on record)
CIK 894556Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Jul 2010
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Sep 2008 to Dec 2012
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- de Castro P.C.First linked Jul 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.40×
- Nelson MullinsFirst linked Aug 2026 · Text search only · 301 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.50× · Went dark 0.48× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- DLA PiperFirst linked May 2025 · Text search only · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Loeb & Loeb LLPFirst linked Apr 2008 · Text search only · 838 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.99× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| de Castro P.C. | Jul 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 0.97 | 0.00 | 1.40 |
| Nelson Mullins | Aug 2026 | Text search only | 301 | 0.50 | 0.48 | 0.88 |
| DLA Piper | May 2025 | Text search only | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| Loeb & Loeb LLP | Apr 2008 | Text search only | 838 | 0.92 | 0.99 | 1.10 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- David E. DanovitchSullivan & Worcester LLPFirst linked Oct 2024 · Named in SEC correspondence · 85 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 1.89× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Stanley MoskowitzFirst linked Jan 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- Michael K. Bradshaw Jr.Nelson MullinsFirst linked Aug 2026 · Text search only · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.78× · Went dark 1.93× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
- Stanley M. Moskowitzde Castro P.C.First linked Feb 2008 · Text search only · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David E. DanovitchSullivan & Worcester LLP | Oct 2024 | Named in SEC correspondence | 85 | 0.88 | 1.89 | 1.25 |
| Stanley Moskowitz | Jan 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 13 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.11 |
| Michael K. Bradshaw Jr.Nelson Mullins | Aug 2026 | Text search only | 23 | 0.78 | 1.93 | 1.09 |
| Stanley M. Moskowitzde Castro P.C. | Feb 2008 | Text search only | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.02 |