COWLITZ BANCORPORATION CWLZ (last ticker on record)
CIK 894267Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- 95% wipeout
- Bankruptcy
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Aug 2010
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- May 2007 to Mar 2011
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Heller EhrmanFirst linked Nov 1999 · Named in a filing · 256 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.76× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Foster PepperFirst linked Jan 1998 · Named in a filing · 43 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.81× · Went dark 0.62× · 95% wipeout 1.92×
- Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.First linked Jul 2005 · Text search only · 995 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Sidley AustinFirst linked Jul 2005 · Text search only · 1,210 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heller Ehrman | Nov 1999 | Named in a filing | 256 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.96 |
| Foster Pepper | Jan 1998 | Named in a filing | 43 | 0.81 | 0.62 | 1.92 |
| Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. | Jul 2005 | Text search only | 995 | 1.46 | 0.37 | 0.80 |
| Sidley Austin | Jul 2005 | Text search only | 1,210 | 1.30 | 0.14 | 0.93 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kenneth E. RobertsFoster PepperFirst linked Jul 2002 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.59×
- David R. WilsonHeller EhrmanFirst linked Jan 1998 · Named in a filing · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 1.29× · 95% wipeout 1.56×
- MITCHELL KLEINMANBrown & WoodFirst linked Jul 2005 · Text search only · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.60×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kenneth E. RobertsFoster Pepper | Jul 2002 | Named in a filing | 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.59 |
| David R. WilsonHeller Ehrman | Jan 1998 | Named in a filing | 25 | 1.00 | 1.29 | 1.56 |
| MITCHELL KLEINMANBrown & Wood | Jul 2005 | Text search only | 6 | 1.27 | 0.00 | 1.60 |