Theriva Biologics, Inc. TOVX (last ticker on record)

CIK 894158Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)

Bankruptcy
Delisting notice (not a red flag)
Restatement
95% wipeout
Restructuring

These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.

Red flags: 4; Newest began Oct 2025
Largest fall in its shares: 99%; Jul 2015 to Oct 2022
Law firms: 13; Linked to 5 or more companies
Lawyers: 6; Linked to 5 or more companies

What happened

Oct 2, 2025Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Oct 1, 2024Shares down 95% from their high
Mar 10, 2023Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Aug 5, 2020Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Feb 7, 2020Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Nov 27, 2019Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Nov 29, 2018Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Jul 26, 2018Shares down 95% from their high
May 22, 2018Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Mar 7, 2018Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
May 30, 2012Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
May 3, 2012Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Jun 26, 2007Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Jul 15, 2005Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)

An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.

Law firms

The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.

Law firms linked to this company
Name	First linked	How it is known	Linked companies	SEC/DOJ scrutiny	Went dark	95% wipeout
Blank Rome	Sep 2022	Named in SEC correspondence	348	1.04	0.79	1.36
Parsons Behle & Latimer	Jul 2013	Named in a filing	66	1.40	1.37	1.31
Gracin & Marlow, LLP	May 2010	Named in SEC correspondence	55	0.97	2.34	1.38
Lehman & Eilen LLP	Dec 2006	Named in SEC correspondence	34	1.23	2.25	0.64
McDermott Will & Emery	Jan 2001	Named in a filing	562	0.97	0.60	1.14
Olshan Frome Wolosky LLP	Oct 1996	Named in a filing	390	1.38	0.86	1.22
Morgan Lewis	Oct 2018	Text search only	1,028	1.18	0.31	1.02
Zysman Aharoni Gayer	Sep 2018	Text search only	42	0.71	0.00	1.40
Duane Morris	May 2018	Text search only	413	0.76	1.28	1.06
Cooley LLP	Jul 2013	Text search only	1,634	0.71	0.44	1.24
Reed Smith	Jul 2013	Text search only	487	1.15	0.77	1.13
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP	Dec 2006	Text search only	2,607	1.15	0.19	0.85
Bryan Cave	Jan 2001	Text search only	471	1.09	0.76	0.98

Lawyers

The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.

Lawyers linked to this company
Name	First linked	How it is known	Linked companies	SEC/DOJ scrutiny	Went dark	95% wipeout
Melissa Palat MurawskyBlank Rome	May 2024	Named in a filing	29	2.06	0.00	1.03
Patrick J. EganGracin & Marlow, LLP	May 2018	Named in SEC correspondence	43	0.40	1.84	1.89
Leslie MarlowBlank Rome	Nov 2010	Named in SEC correspondence	71	0.58	2.60	1.43
Hank GracinGracin & Marlow, LLP	Nov 2006	Named in SEC correspondence	77	0.66	2.28	1.53
Daniel I. GoldbergCooley LLP	Jul 2013	Text search only	184	0.64	0.00	1.03
David A. CifrinoMcDermott Will & Emery	Jan 2001	Text search only	15	0.35	0.00	0.51