POWERCHANNEL INC SLTN (last ticker on record)
CIK 894049Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began May 2004
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC administrative actionSEC order (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Sichenzia Ross Ference LLPFirst linked Jan 2004 · Named in a filing · 1,005 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 1.62× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- ANSLOW & JACLIN, LLPFirst linked Aug 2003 · Named in a filing · 375 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 1.40× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Michael HarrisFirst linked Jun 2004 · Text search only · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.65× · Went dark 1.05× · 95% wipeout 1.47×
- Stephen M. FlemingFirst linked Feb 2004 · Text search only · 64 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.42× · Went dark 1.22× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sichenzia Ross Ference LLP | Jan 2004 | Named in a filing | 1,005 | 1.27 | 1.62 | 1.26 |
| ANSLOW & JACLIN, LLP | Aug 2003 | Named in a filing | 375 | 1.17 | 1.40 | 0.93 |
| Michael Harris | Jun 2004 | Text search only | 25 | 1.65 | 1.05 | 1.47 |
| Stephen M. Fleming | Feb 2004 | Text search only | 64 | 1.42 | 1.22 | 1.25 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Richard A. FriedmanSichenzia Ross Ference LLPFirst linked Jan 2004 · Named in a filing · 190 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 1.93× · 95% wipeout 1.29×
- Stephen M. FlemingStephen M. FlemingFirst linked Jan 2004 · Named in a filing · 84 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 1.15× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Gregg E. JaclinANSLOW & JACLIN, LLPFirst linked Aug 2003 · Named in a filing · 338 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 1.39× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
- Richard P. GreeneRICHARD P. GREENEFirst linked Jun 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 0.70× · 95% wipeout 0.57×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richard A. FriedmanSichenzia Ross Ference LLP | Jan 2004 | Named in a filing | 190 | 1.27 | 1.93 | 1.29 |
| Stephen M. FlemingStephen M. Fleming | Jan 2004 | Named in a filing | 84 | 1.08 | 1.15 | 1.06 |
| Gregg E. JaclinANSLOW & JACLIN, LLP | Aug 2003 | Named in a filing | 338 | 1.23 | 1.39 | 0.89 |
| Richard P. GreeneRICHARD P. GREENE | Jun 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 19 | 0.99 | 0.70 | 0.57 |