PLATO LEARNING INC TUTR (last ticker on record)
CIK 893965Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Jun 2005
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Faegre & BensonFirst linked Dec 2008 · Named in a filing · 160 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.90× · Went dark 0.59× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Sep 2003 · Named in a filing · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Maslon Edelman Borman & Brand, LLPFirst linked Mar 2002 · Named in a filing · 88 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.65× · Went dark 0.83× · 95% wipeout 1.52×
- Winston & StrawnFirst linked Jul 1997 · Named in a filing · 585 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison LLPFirst linked Nov 2002 · Text search only · 350 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.81× · 95% wipeout 1.52×
- Snow Becker Krauss P.C.First linked Feb 2001 · Text search only · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.50× · Went dark 1.67× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Faegre & Benson | Dec 2008 | Named in a filing | 160 | 0.90 | 0.59 | 1.08 |
| Cooley LLP | Sep 2003 | Named in a filing | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| Maslon Edelman Borman & Brand, LLP | Mar 2002 | Named in a filing | 88 | 0.65 | 0.83 | 1.52 |
| Winston & Strawn | Jul 1997 | Named in a filing | 585 | 1.18 | 0.60 | 1.02 |
| Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison LLP | Nov 2002 | Text search only | 350 | 1.17 | 0.81 | 1.52 |
| Snow Becker Krauss P.C. | Feb 2001 | Text search only | 37 | 1.50 | 1.67 | 1.42 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- W. Morgan BurnsFaegre & BensonFirst linked Dec 2008 · Named in a filing · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Cary K. HydenLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Apr 2001 · Named in a filing · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.03× · Went dark 0.93× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Derek D. DundasLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Apr 2001 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.55× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.05×
- Leland E. HutchinsonWinston & StrawnFirst linked Jan 1998 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.89× · Went dark 1.63× · 95% wipeout 0.97×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| W. Morgan BurnsFaegre & Benson | Dec 2008 | Named in a filing | 27 | 1.11 | 0.00 | 1.28 |
| Cary K. HydenLatham & Watkins LLP | Apr 2001 | Named in a filing | 19 | 2.03 | 0.93 | 1.06 |
| Derek D. DundasLatham & Watkins LLP | Apr 2001 | Named in a filing | 10 | 2.55 | 0.00 | 2.05 |
| Leland E. HutchinsonWinston & Strawn | Jan 1998 | Named in a filing | 10 | 1.89 | 1.63 | 0.97 |